Code Review
Automated code review and analysis
phase-review
by mcouthon
"Review implementation plans for a particular phase in a larger plan for flaws before committing to them. Use when reviewing phase plans from .tasks/ directory. Triggers on: 'use phase mode', 'review phase', 'review the plan', 'check phase', 'validate phase', 'review phase N', 'check the plan for phase'."
daemon-start
by terrylica
Start the asciinema chunker daemon. TRIGGERS - start daemon, resume chunker, enable backup.
data-analysis
by lingzhi227
Generate statistical analysis code with 4-round review. Select appropriate statistical tests, interpret results, and produce analysis reports with p-values, effect sizes, and confidence intervals. Use when analyzing experimental data for a paper.
customer-review
by wcygan
Customer voice: Preserve authentic customer language in evidence
review-changes
by wcygan
Orchestrate multiple review agents for a comprehensive pre-PR code review. Analyzes diff, verifies intent alignment with linked issues, and checks for broader codebase impacts. Use before opening a PR to catch bugs, security issues, silent failures, and performance problems. Keywords: review, code review, pre-PR, diff review, check changes, audit changes
data-review
by wcygan
Review data pipelines, warehouses, analytics infrastructure for reliability, quality, performance, governance, and cost. Spawns specialized agents (data-engineer, data-scientist, performance-analyst, security-auditor) to audit in parallel, then debate architecture trade-offs. Use when evaluating data platforms, assessing pipeline health, optimizing queries, or auditing data governance and compliance. Keywords: data pipeline, warehouse, analytics, ETL, data quality, query optimization, data governance, compliance, data platform.
debt-audit
by wcygan
Re-audit regularly - debt grows; quarterly audits prevent accumulation
business-review
by wcygan
Launch a multi-function business review team to evaluate product ideas, features, or applications from stakeholder perspectives. Agents represent product management, marketing, engineering, finance, data science, data engineering, sales, and synthesis roles. Use when evaluating a new feature, assessing product viability, planning launches, or need cross-functional input on business decisions. Keywords: business review, product evaluation, feature assessment, stakeholder analysis, cross-functional review, product viability, go-to-market, unit economics, technical feasibility
launch-ready
by wcygan
Vague recommendations: "Monitor closely" is not a mitigation plan
spike
by wcygan
Quick prototype or investigation in an isolated git worktree. Creates a worktree, spawns agents to explore a technical approach, and opens a draft PR with findings. Use for time-boxed technical exploration, feasibility testing, library evaluation, or codebase audits. Keywords: spike, prototype, worktree, explore, feasibility, proof of concept, PoC, try, experiment, can we use, audit, investigate, trace, wired up
brainstorm
by wcygan
Multi-agent brainstorming for software design decisions and architecture choices. Spawns parallel agents with differentiated roles (codebase explorer, trade-off analyst, devil's advocate) to evaluate options, surface blind spots, and produce structured analysis including trade-off matrices, pre-mortems, and ADR-ready summaries. Use when making architecture decisions, choosing between approaches, or evaluating trade-offs. Keywords: brainstorm, decision, trade-off, architecture, design, evaluate, options, approach, choose, pros cons, ADR, pre-mortem, WWHTBT
gh-cli
by wcygan
Work with GitHub from the command line using the GitHub CLI (gh). Use when managing repositories, pull requests, issues, releases, GitHub Actions, or any GitHub operations. Keywords: github, gh, pull request, PR, issue, release, workflow, actions, repository, fork, clone, merge
Cognitive Load Reviewer & Guide
by wcygan
References: principles, code-patterns, architecture, review-checklist
agent-team
by wcygan
Launch and coordinate Claude Code agent teams for complex tasks. Use when the user wants to parallelize work across multiple agents, needs a team for review, debugging, design, or feature development, or asks to "create a team" or "spawn agents." Keywords: agent team, team, spawn, teammates, parallel agents, coordinate, collaborate, multi-agent
security-review
by wcygan
Run a targeted security audit on specified files or modules. Uses OWASP-informed checks, dependency vulnerability scanning, and auth/input validation review. Use for security audits, vulnerability checks, or before deploying sensitive code. Keywords: security, audit, vulnerability, OWASP, CVE, secrets, injection, XSS, auth, authentication, authorization
create-pr
by wcygan
Create a pull request using git and GitHub CLI. Handles the full workflow from committing changes to opening a PR. Use when creating a PR, opening a pull request, submitting changes for review, or pushing a branch for review. Keywords: pull request, PR, create PR, open PR, submit PR, push for review, code review
diff-explain
by wcygan
Explain a diff in plain English. Works with staged changes, unstaged changes, commits, branches, or PR numbers. Use when you want to understand what changed and why. Keywords: diff, explain diff, what changed, understand changes, diff summary, review changes, read diff
fast-commit
by wcygan
Stage all changes with git add -A and commit immediately with a concise message derived from recent work. Use when you want to quickly commit everything without interactive review or confirmation. Keywords: fast commit, quick commit, commit everything, stage all, commit all, ship it
refactor-scan
by wcygan
Scan code for refactoring opportunities to improve modularity, testability, extensibility, reusability, understandability, and cognitive complexity. Use when reviewing code quality, identifying technical debt, planning a refactor, or improving code structure. Keywords: refactor, refactoring, code quality, modularity, testability, extensibility, reusability, cognitive complexity, code smell, clean code, SOLID, DRY, coupling, cohesion
arch-review
by wcygan
RFC-style review of major technical decisions using a 5-agent debate team. Spawns tech-lead, security-auditor, performance-analyst, reliability-engineer, and devils-advocate for independent analysis followed by structured discussion. Produces decision document with pros/cons, dissenting opinions, and recommendation. Use for architecture decisions, technology selection, major refactors, design reviews. Keywords: architecture, RFC, design review, technical decision, architecture review, design decision, major change
review-ai-writing
by existential-birds
Detect AI-generated writing patterns in developer text — docs, docstrings, commit messages, PR descriptions, and code comments. Use when reviewing any text artifact for authenticity and clarity.
elixir-performance-review
by existential-birds
Reviews Elixir code for performance issues including GenServer bottlenecks, memory usage, and concurrency patterns. Use when reviewing high-throughput code or investigating performance issues.
github-automation
by vm0-ai
Automate GitHub operations using gh CLI - manage repositories, issues, pull requests, releases, and workflows. Use when working with GitHub, managing repos, creating issues/PRs, or when users mention GitHub operations, gh CLI, or repository management.
access-review
by BagelHole
Conduct periodic access reviews and certifications. Implement access governance and recertification workflows. Use when managing access compliance.