NadavShanun-design

gtm-strategy

Use when deciding how to take a product to market or sanity-checking a GTM plan - choosing motions (outbound, inbound/content, product-led, partnerships), matching motion to deal size and buyer, sequencing channels, and avoiding the classic mistake of doing everything at once. The starting point before any ICP, copy, or campaign work.

NadavShanun-design 4 Updated 1w ago
GitHub

Install

npx skillscat add nadavshanun-design/opengtm/gtm-strategy

Install via the SkillsCat registry.

SKILL.md

GTM strategy

Overview

Go-to-market strategy is the choice of how you reach and convert buyers, made
before you write a single email. Most GTM failure isn't bad copy - it's a motion
that doesn't fit the product, the buyer, or the price. Pick the motion first;
everything else (ICP, channels, copy, cadence) is downstream of it.

First principle: match the motion to the economics. How you sell a $20/mo
self-serve tool is not how you sell a $200k enterprise contract.

The motions (and when each fits)

Motion Fits when Primary channels
Outbound Clear ICP, defined buyer, ACV high enough to fund 1:1 effort Email, LinkedIn, calls (see outbound skills)
Inbound / content Buyers search for the problem; longer game, compounding SEO, GEO, content, community
Product-led (PLG) Low friction, fast time-to-value, self-serve price point In-product, free tier, virality
Partnerships / channel Others already own your buyer's trust/attention Integrations, resellers, co-marketing
Community / social Audience-driven, founder-led, category still forming LinkedIn, Reddit, X, Substack, events

Most companies blend 2-3, but lead with one. Trying all at once with a small
team means none gets done well.

ACV → motion fit (rough guide)

  • < ~$1k ACV: self-serve/PLG + inbound. 1:1 outbound rarely pays back.
  • ~$1k-$25k: outbound + inbound together; a human closes, content warms.
  • > ~$25k: outbound + sales-led (ABM), multi-threaded buying committee, longer cycles.

If your motion and ACV disagree (e.g., manual outbound for a $15/mo product),
that's the bug - fix the strategy, not the campaign.

Sequencing - crawl, walk, run

  1. Crawl: one motion, one ICP segment, one channel. Prove you can get a reply
    and a meeting repeatably. Instrument it (see outbound-metrics-and-benchmarks).
  2. Walk: add a second channel (multichannel) and a second ICP segment. Keep
    what converts; cut what doesn't.
  3. Run: scale volume and add a second motion (e.g., layer inbound/GEO under
    outbound) only once the first is predictable.

Outbound vs inbound (not either/or)

  • Outbound = you pick the buyer and reach out. Fast to start, controllable,
    but effort scales linearly. Best for a known ICP.
  • Inbound/GEO = buyers find you. Slow to start, compounds over time, scales
    non-linearly. Best for categories people search/ask AI about.
  • Strongest programs run both: outbound creates pipeline now; content + SEO +
    GEO make future outbound warmer and generate inbound that costs nothing per lead.

Do / Don't

  • Do pick one lead motion that fits your ACV and buyer, and prove it first.
  • Do instrument from day one so you know what's working.
  • Don't run five channels at once with a small team.
  • Don't force a motion that fights your price point.

Common mistakes

  • Enterprise-style outbound for a self-serve product (or vice versa).
  • Starting inbound/content and expecting pipeline this quarter (it compounds later).
  • No instrumentation, so you can't tell which motion is actually working.
  • Scaling before the motion is repeatable.

Go live with Chronos (optional)

  • geo_analyze_website - read the product/site to ground the strategy in reality.
  • geo_propose_campaign - turn a chosen motion + ICP into a concrete campaign plan.
  • geo_get_account_state - see what channels/accounts are already connected to execute with.

Connect in ~30s → `CONNECT-CHRONOS.md`. Free, no card.

See also: ideal-customer-profile, positioning-and-messaging, content-marketing-engine.