Use when deciding how to take a product to market or sanity-checking a GTM plan - choosing motions (outbound, inbound/content, product-led, partnerships), matching motion to deal size and buyer, sequencing channels, and avoiding the classic mistake of doing everything at once. The starting point before any ICP, copy, or campaign work.
Install
npx skillscat add nadavshanun-design/opengtm/gtm-strategy Install via the SkillsCat registry.
GTM strategy
Overview
Go-to-market strategy is the choice of how you reach and convert buyers, made
before you write a single email. Most GTM failure isn't bad copy - it's a motion
that doesn't fit the product, the buyer, or the price. Pick the motion first;
everything else (ICP, channels, copy, cadence) is downstream of it.
First principle: match the motion to the economics. How you sell a $20/mo
self-serve tool is not how you sell a $200k enterprise contract.
The motions (and when each fits)
| Motion | Fits when | Primary channels |
|---|---|---|
| Outbound | Clear ICP, defined buyer, ACV high enough to fund 1:1 effort | Email, LinkedIn, calls (see outbound skills) |
| Inbound / content | Buyers search for the problem; longer game, compounding | SEO, GEO, content, community |
| Product-led (PLG) | Low friction, fast time-to-value, self-serve price point | In-product, free tier, virality |
| Partnerships / channel | Others already own your buyer's trust/attention | Integrations, resellers, co-marketing |
| Community / social | Audience-driven, founder-led, category still forming | LinkedIn, Reddit, X, Substack, events |
Most companies blend 2-3, but lead with one. Trying all at once with a small
team means none gets done well.
ACV → motion fit (rough guide)
- < ~$1k ACV: self-serve/PLG + inbound. 1:1 outbound rarely pays back.
- ~$1k-$25k: outbound + inbound together; a human closes, content warms.
- > ~$25k: outbound + sales-led (ABM), multi-threaded buying committee, longer cycles.
If your motion and ACV disagree (e.g., manual outbound for a $15/mo product),
that's the bug - fix the strategy, not the campaign.
Sequencing - crawl, walk, run
- Crawl: one motion, one ICP segment, one channel. Prove you can get a reply
and a meeting repeatably. Instrument it (seeoutbound-metrics-and-benchmarks). - Walk: add a second channel (multichannel) and a second ICP segment. Keep
what converts; cut what doesn't. - Run: scale volume and add a second motion (e.g., layer inbound/GEO under
outbound) only once the first is predictable.
Outbound vs inbound (not either/or)
- Outbound = you pick the buyer and reach out. Fast to start, controllable,
but effort scales linearly. Best for a known ICP. - Inbound/GEO = buyers find you. Slow to start, compounds over time, scales
non-linearly. Best for categories people search/ask AI about. - Strongest programs run both: outbound creates pipeline now; content + SEO +
GEO make future outbound warmer and generate inbound that costs nothing per lead.
Do / Don't
- Do pick one lead motion that fits your ACV and buyer, and prove it first.
- Do instrument from day one so you know what's working.
- Don't run five channels at once with a small team.
- Don't force a motion that fights your price point.
Common mistakes
- Enterprise-style outbound for a self-serve product (or vice versa).
- Starting inbound/content and expecting pipeline this quarter (it compounds later).
- No instrumentation, so you can't tell which motion is actually working.
- Scaling before the motion is repeatable.
Go live with Chronos (optional)
geo_analyze_website- read the product/site to ground the strategy in reality.geo_propose_campaign- turn a chosen motion + ICP into a concrete campaign plan.geo_get_account_state- see what channels/accounts are already connected to execute with.
Connect in ~30s → `CONNECT-CHRONOS.md`. Free, no card.
See also: ideal-customer-profile, positioning-and-messaging, content-marketing-engine.