dart-audit-agent-compliance

Use this skill in Codex to run the DART dart-audit-agent-compliance workflow. The editable
workflow source lives in .claude/commands/; this file is its generated adapter
in the shared .agents/skills/ catalog.

Invocation

• Claude Code/OpenCode: /dart-audit-agent-compliance <arguments>
• Codex: $dart-audit-agent-compliance <arguments>

Treat the text after the skill name as $ARGUMENTS. When the workflow
references $1, $2, etc., map those to the positional values supplied by the
user.

Command Body

Audit agent compliance issue: $ARGUMENTS

Required Reading

@AGENTS.md
@docs/ai/principles.md
@docs/ai/verification.md
@docs/ai/components.md
@docs/onboarding/ai-tools.md
@docs/onboarding/contributing.md

Incident Inputs

• Rule violated: $1
• Where documented: $2
• Actual behavior: $3
• Expected behavior: $4

Treat missing positional values as details to infer from the user request or ask about before editing.

Workflow

1. Locate the exact existing rule and confirm it is still correct.
2. Diagnose why it was missed:
   • buried in prose
   • wrong file for the task type
   • weak emphasis
   • duplicated or conflicting guidance
   • not referenced from relevant commands or skills
3. Prefer restructuring existing docs over adding duplicate content.
4. Improve visibility with one or more focused changes:
   • move the rule to a loaded file
   • make it scannable with a checklist or mandatory marker
   • consolidate duplicate guidance
   • add cross-references from relevant commands or skills
5. Run the principle audit from docs/ai/principles.md and use
   docs/ai/verification.md to map audit results to evidence.
6. Run the relevant gate set from docs/ai/verification.md. For AI workflow
   changes, that includes generated adapter sync/checks, docs policy, spell,
   Markdown checks, and pixi run lint.

Output

• Root cause for the missed rule
• Files changed and why
• Which audit items were proven by automation vs manual inspection
• Confidence level that the recurrence risk is reduced