Comments

Code comments and annotations

Showing 217-240 of 2099 skills
BuilderIO

babysit-pr

by BuilderIO

Monitor a PR, fix feedback and CI failures until fully green for 30 min. Run with /babysit-pr <number>

Comments 7.5K 1mo ago
BuilderIO

ship-now

by BuilderIO

Fast-path the current branch through local pnpm prep:urgent, targeted recovery, feedback resolution, whole-branch push, immediate admin merge, and fresh-branch rotation. Use when the user explicitly wants to merge immediately after local prep recovery, then monitor beta, docs production, and release workflows. GitHub Actions auto-deploys beta and the docs site through the prebuilt publisher; other production promotion is manual.

Comments 7.5K 1mo ago
BuilderIO

visual-recap

by BuilderIO

Turn a PR, branch, commit, or git diff into an interactive visual recap with diagrams, file maps, API/schema summaries, annotated diffs, and focused review notes.

Comments 7.5K 3mo ago
syswonder

robonix-writing

by syswonder

Write or edit commit messages, PR and issue descriptions, READMEs and code comments for Robonix so they read like a person wrote them. Use whenever producing prose that goes into the repository or onto GitHub.

Comments 405 26d ago
syswonder

robonix-simplify

by syswonder

Shrink a Robonix change before review without changing behaviour. Use when a feature works and tests pass, before opening or updating a PR, and when a review asks for a smaller change.

Comments 405 26d ago
syswonder

robonix-code-review

by syswonder

Review a Robonix change against the repository's coding guidelines and write a Markdown review. Use when asked to review a branch, a PR, or files, and before asking a human to review your own change.

Comments 405 26d ago
alchaincyf

feynman-perspective

by alchaincyf

理查德·费曼的思维框架与表达方式。基于40+个一手来源的深度调研, 提炼5个核心心智模型、8条决策启发式和完整的表达DNA。 用途:作为思维顾问,用费曼的视角分析问题、审视决策、提供反馈。 当用户提到「用费曼的视角」「费曼会怎么看」「费曼模式」「feynman perspective」「费曼学习法」时使用。 即使用户只是说「这是不是cargo cult」「命名不等于理解」「能不能做个演示替代论证」「我真的理解了还是只记住了名字」也可触发。 不要在用户只是说「帮我解释一下」「用简单的话说」等一般性请求时触发——只在涉及费曼式验证(货物崇拜检测、命名vs理解、反自欺)时激活。

Comments 35.7K 4mo ago
affaan-m

plan-canvas

by affaan-m

Open plans and HTML artifacts in a local browser canvas where the human annotates elements, chats, and approves or requests changes without leaving the page. Use when presenting a plan for review, or when feedback like "move this, change that" is easier pointed at than typed.

CLI Tools 287.4K 2mo ago
affaan-m

perl-security

by affaan-m

Comprehensive Perl security covering taint mode, input validation, safe process execution, DBI parameterized queries, web security (XSS/SQLi/CSRF), and perlcritic security policies. Use when reviewing Perl input handling, process execution, DBI queries, or web-facing code.

CLI Tools 287.4K 2mo ago
anthropics

eli5

by anthropics

Explain a topic like I'm a 5 year old. Use when the user types /eli5 <topic> or asks for a dead-simple picture explainer of how something works.

Comments 4.8K 2mo ago
brycewang-stanford

econ-write

by brycewang-stanford

"Expert economics paper writing assistant synthesizing advice from 50+ top guides by Cochrane, McCloskey, Shapiro, Head, Bellemare, Goldin, Glaeser, Kremer, and other leading economists. USE THIS SKILL whenever the user writes, edits, reviews, rewrites, or structures any economics paper, thesis, job market paper, abstract, introduction, conclusion, results section, literature review, or referee response. Also handles LaTeX formatting, presentations, and paper audits. Covers all paper types (applied, theory, structural, mixed) and all sections."

Academic 4.8K 4mo ago
brycewang-stanford

academic-paper-reviewer

by brycewang-stanford

"Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Simulates 5 independent reviewers (EIC + 3 peer reviewers + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, and Socratic guided modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review."

Comments 4.8K 6mo ago
basicmachines-co

bm-setup

by basicmachines-co

Set up Basic Memory for Codex at user or project level by mapping a Basic Memory project and seeding schemas.

Comments 4.3K 1mo ago
brycewang-stanford

academic-pipeline

by brycewang-stanford

"Orchestrator for the full academic research pipeline: research -> write -> integrity check -> review -> revise -> re-review -> re-revise -> final integrity check -> finalize. Coordinates deep-research, academic-paper, and academic-paper-reviewer into a seamless 9-stage workflow with mandatory integrity verification, two-stage peer review, and reproducible quality gates. Triggers on: academic pipeline, research to paper, full paper workflow, paper pipeline, end-to-end paper, research-to-publication, complete paper workflow."

Comments 4.8K 6mo ago
warpdotdev

check-impl-against-spec

by warpdotdev

Compare a pull request's implementation against spec context in spec_context.md and feed any material mismatches into review.json. Use during PR review when approved or repository spec context is available.

Code Review 629 5mo ago
warpdotdev

review-pr

by warpdotdev

Review a pull request diff and write structured feedback to review.json for the workflow to publish. Use when reviewing a checked-out PR from local artifacts like pr_diff.txt and pr_description.txt and producing machine-readable review output instead of posting directly to GitHub.

Comments 629 2mo ago
warpdotdev

respond-to-pr-comments-in-blocklist

by warpdotdev

Interactively walk a user through PR review comments one at a time, collect a per-comment decision, then post agent-authored replies on GitHub and resolve the review threads once the user approves a preview. Use only when the user wants to reply to or resolve review threads on GitHub. Skip when the user only wants comments fetched or displayed (use pr-comments), or only wants the code changes made without posting anything back to GitHub.

Comments 629 2mo ago
warpdotdev

validate-changes-match-specs

by warpdotdev

Validate that a branch or pull request implementation matches introduced product, technical, security, and related specs. Use when reviewing or finishing a spec-driven change and resolving mismatches between checked-in specs and implementation.

Comments 629 2mo ago
warpdotdev

pr-walkthrough

by warpdotdev

Generate a static interactive D3 walkthrough of a pull request. Use when the user wants a zoomable PR map, graph/canvas PR orientation, or alternate visualization of PR system components, data flow, code dependencies, and user actions.

Comments 629 4mo ago
warpdotdev

write-pr-description

by warpdotdev

Writes the body of a pull request - the summary, the repository template sections, and reviewer guidance such as a recommended reading order and focus areas. Use whenever drafting or revising a PR description, filling in a repository's PR template, refreshing a description that no longer matches the branch, or preparing a branch for review. Use it even when the user only says "open a PR", "put this up for review", or "write this up" without naming the description.

Comments 629 2mo ago
warpdotdev

reproduce-bug-report

by warpdotdev

Launch Oz cloud agents with computer use to reproduce UI-focused bug reports, capture visual evidence (a screen recording by default), and report reproduction findings. Use when investigating a specific interactive or visual bug from an issue, ticket, support report, or prompt.

Agents 629 2mo ago
PolyArch

humanize-refine-plan

by PolyArch

Refine an annotated implementation plan into a comment-free plan and a QA ledger while preserving the gen-plan schema.

Comments 1.6K 7mo ago
addyosmani

using-agent-skills

by addyosmani

Discovers and invokes agent skills. Use when starting a session or when you need to discover which skill applies to the current task. This is the meta-skill that governs how all other skills are discovered and invoked.

CI/CD 110.1K 2mo ago
BuilderIO

review-latest-feedback

by BuilderIO

Sweep recent Slack, GitHub issue, Sentry, first-party Agent-Native Analytics error issues, and explicitly linked tracker feedback: first answer reporters, then fix verified bugs and actionable objective UI defects at the owning boundary, require human signoff for subjective UI changes, build features the invoking user endorsed with an :upvote:, and recap every disposition. Use for scheduled or manual sweeps.

Code Review 7.5K 1mo ago