Academic
Academic writing, research, citations
ambiguity-resolver
by mohitagw15856
"Structure vague opportunities and unclear briefs into actionable one-page problem statements. Use when asked to clarify a vague brief, frame an undefined problem, make sense of an unclear opportunity, or when the user says 'we need to figure out what to do about X' or 'I've been asked to look into Y'. Produces a structured problem brief with reframed questions, scoped boundaries, and a minimum viable research plan."
scientific-problem-selection
by anthropics
This skill should be used when scientists need help with research problem selection, project ideation, troubleshooting stuck projects, or strategic scientific decisions. Use this skill when users ask to pitch a new research idea, work through a project problem, evaluate project risks, plan research strategy, navigate decision trees, or get help choosing what scientific problem to work on. Typical requests include "I have an idea for a project", "I'm stuck on my research", "help me evaluate this project", "what should I work on", or "I need strategic advice about my research".
Do your research — deep
by melodic-software
"Escalate research discipline to a heavy verification fan-out over a TYPED FULL INVENTORY of the session's claims — assumptions, asserted facts, concrete specifics (paths, defaults, flags, signatures), and load-bearing premises — verifying each against a primary source at a configurable depth (tiered by default, or full), then report a per-item ledger with verdict, source, source tier, consensus count, and recency. Use when: 'deep research pass', 'verify every claim', 'audit all our claims', 'fact-check everything', 'fact-check all these claims', 'go make sure those are all right', 'we've made a lot of load-bearing claims', or when your own judgement is the suspected bias across many claims. For a single or small inline fact-check ('fact-check that'), use the sibling do-your-research."
Pick for the problem
by melodic-software
"Re-anchor the discipline that a tool, library, framework, language, or approach is chosen to fit the actual problem — not reached for out of habit, availability, incumbency, or preconception — then audit the selection in flight and re-derive it from the problem. Use when: 'pick for the problem', 'right tool for the job', 'which library should we use', 'what framework', 'should we build this or use X', 'is this the right approach', 'you defaulted to X', 'we always reach for X', 'evaluate the options', 'choose a dependency', or at conversation start on a build-vs-buy or technology-selection decision."
Point, don't copy
by melodic-software
"Re-anchor pointer-over-copy discipline, then audit the work in flight for copied content, internal-name coupling, and closed capability lists, and correct by pointing at the living source. Use when: 'point don't copy', 'you copied that', 'don't duplicate the docs', 'cite instead of paste', 'link don't restate', 'you enumerated the tools', 'that couples to internal names', 'this will drift', or at conversation start on documentation work."
Mind your maxims
by melodic-software
"Re-anchor cooperative-communication discipline — Grice's conversational maxims plus the AI-augmented transparency maxim — then audit recent responses and agent-authored artifacts for what the reader actually needed: completeness in both directions, relevance, clarity, and disclosed boundaries. Use when: 'mind your maxims', 'communication quality', 'answer what I asked', 'you buried the answer', 'you didn't answer the question', 'too vague', 'stay on topic', 'is this clear', 'grice', 'maxims', or at conversation start to set the communication posture."
blog-strategy
by AgriciDaniel
Blog strategy development including topic cluster architecture with hub-and-spoke design, audience mapping, competitive landscape analysis, AI citation surface strategy across ChatGPT/Perplexity/AI Overviews, distribution channel planning (YouTube, Reddit, review platforms for GEO), content scoring targets, measurement framework, and content differentiation through original research and first-hand experience. Use when user says "blog strategy", "content strategy", "blog positioning", "what should I blog about", "blog topics", "content pillars", "blog ideation".
researchwrite
by Yuan1z0825
Proposal-first scientific writing pipeline, installed under the compatibility trigger researchwrite and the repository package name nature-proposal-writer. Use for composing, revising, or auditing research proposals, opening reports, research plans, and evidence-grounded scientific writing. Three modes (compose/revise/hybrid) with a four-layer QA pipeline. Enforces evidence-before-prose, argument-before-sections, and contracts-before-paragraphs.
nature-paper-card
by Yuan1z0825
Build a source-grounded deep-reading Paper Card for one scientific paper, preprint, PDF, DOI, arXiv page, publisher article, or pasted paper text. Use when the user asks for a Paper Card, deep-reading literature card, single-paper deep analysis, module-by-module analysis, experiment-to-claim evidence chain, conclusion-boundary audit, critical analysis, knowledge connections, or candidate research ideas. Produce the fixed Sections 01-16 covering bibliographic position, research question, background route, pain point, core insight, method and module logic, essential formulas, experiment-to-claim evidence, conclusion boundaries, author-stated limitations, critical analysis, learned knowledge, knowledge connections, and testable research ideas. Do not use for full-paper bilingual translation, formal peer-review reports, batch literature monitoring, academic-English collection, comprehension quizzes, or public-article writing.
bgpt-paper-search
by K-Dense-AI
Search scientific papers and retrieve structured experimental data extracted from full-text studies via the BGPT MCP server. Returns 25+ fields per paper including methods, results, sample sizes, quality scores, and conclusions. Use for literature reviews, evidence synthesis, and finding experimental details not available in abstracts alone.
citation-management
by K-Dense-AI
Comprehensive citation management for academic research. Search Google Scholar and PubMed for papers, extract accurate metadata, validate citations, and generate properly formatted BibTeX entries. This skill should be used when you need to find papers, verify citation information, convert DOIs to BibTeX, or ensure reference accuracy in scientific writing.
clinical-decision-support
by K-Dense-AI
Generate professional clinical decision support (CDS) documents for pharmaceutical and clinical research settings, including patient cohort analyses (biomarker-stratified with outcomes) and treatment recommendation reports (evidence-based guidelines with decision algorithms). Supports GRADE evidence grading, statistical analysis (hazard ratios, survival curves, waterfall plots), biomarker integration, and regulatory compliance. Outputs publication-ready LaTeX/PDF format optimized for drug development, clinical research, and evidence synthesis.
biorxiv-database
by K-Dense-AI
Efficient database search tool for bioRxiv preprint server. Use this skill when searching for life sciences preprints by keywords, authors, date ranges, or categories, retrieving paper metadata, downloading PDFs, or conducting literature reviews.
denario
by K-Dense-AI
Multiagent AI system for scientific research assistance that automates research workflows from data analysis to publication. This skill should be used when generating research ideas from datasets, developing research methodologies, executing computational experiments, performing literature searches, or generating publication-ready papers in LaTeX format. Supports end-to-end research pipelines with customizable agent orchestration.
econ-abstract-writing
by brycewang-stanford
Guide for writing the abstract of an academic economics paper. Use this skill whenever the user asks for help writing, drafting, revising, or structuring an abstract for an economics paper - whether empirical micro, development economics, applied economics, or related fields. Also trigger when the user mentions "abstract," "paper summary," or asks how to compress their findings into a short description. This skill synthesizes best practices from David Evans (CGDev), Marc Bellemare, and patterns observed in top economics journals (AER, QJE, AEJ: Applied, etc.).
Novelty Check Skill
by brycewang-stanford
🔬 A curated collection of 23,000+ agent skills for empirical research across 8 social science disciplines. 精选 23,000+ AI Agent 技能库，覆盖8大社会科学学科的实证研究。CoPaper.AI 20分钟完成一篇可复现的规范实证论文，并支持用户上传 Skills。-- Maintained by CoPaper.AI from Stanford REAP.
stata-accounting-research
by brycewang-stanford
STATA code pattern library for empirical archival accounting research. Provides tested syntax from 126 peer-reviewed JAR (Journal of Accounting Research) replication files (2017-2025). Use when the user asks procedural questions like "How do I implement [method]?" or "Show me code for [technique]" — including: entropy balancing, propensity score matching (PSM), difference-in-differences (DiD), regression discontinuity (RDD), instrumental variables (IV), event studies (CAR/BHAR), survival analysis, Fama-MacBeth regressions, bootstrap, quantile regression, reghdfe/xtreg/areg, clustering standard errors, fixed effects, esttab/outreg2 table formatting, winsorization, leads/lags. Users can specify their variables (e.g., treatment, outcomes, controls) and receive adapted syntax. NOTE: This skill provides code patterns from published papers, not research design advice.
thematic-analysis
by brycewang-stanford
"Conduct rigorous thematic analysis (TA) of qualitative data following Braun and Clarke's (2006) six-phase framework. Use whenever the user mentions 'thematic analysis', 'TA', 'Braun and Clarke', 'qualitative coding', 'identifying themes', or asks for help analysing interviews, focus groups, open-ended survey responses, or transcripts to identify patterns. Also trigger for questions about inductive vs theoretical coding, semantic vs latent themes, essentialist vs constructionist epistemology, building a thematic map, or writing up a qualitative findings section. Covers all six phases, the four upfront analytic decisions, the 15-point quality checklist, and the five common pitfalls. Produces a Word document write-up and an annotated thematic map. Does NOT cover IPA, grounded theory, discourse analysis, conversation analysis, or narrative analysis — use a different method for those."
arxiv
by brycewang-stanford
Search and retrieve academic papers from arXiv using their free REST API. No API key needed. Search by keyword, author, category, or ID. Combine with web_extract or the ocr-and-documents skill to read full paper content.
humanize-chinese
by brycewang-stanford
Detect and humanize AI-generated Chinese text. 20+ rule detection categories plus statistical features (sentence-length CV, short-sentence fraction, comma density, perplexity, GLTR, DivEye) plus scene-aware LR fusion (rule × 0.2 + LR × 0.8) trained on three scenes: general / academic / longform 长文本 (≥1500 字)。Unified CLI: ./humanize {detect,rewrite,academic,style,compare}. 8 style transforms (casual/zhihu/xiaohongshu/wechat/academic/literary/weibo/novel)。 Multi-paragraph rewriting (paragraph length CV、跨段 trigram 重复) plus best-of-N humanize (默认 N=10 取最低 LR)。165 replacement patterns + CiLin 同义词词林 38873 with collision blacklist。 Academic paper AIGC reduction for CNKI/VIP/Wanfang (知网/维普/万方 AIGC 检测降重)。 Pure Python, no dependencies, offline。v5.0.0 — HC3 fused 准确率 95%、学术 hero 100→35 (-65)、 工作汇报 96→13 (-83)、长篇博客 96→41 (-55)。 Use when user says: "去AI味", "降AIGC", "人性化文本", "humanize chinese", "AI检测", "AIGC降重", "去除AI痕迹", "文本改写", "论文降重", "知网检测", "维普检测", "AI写作检测", "让文字更自然", "detect AI text", "humanize text", "reduce AIGC score", "make text human-like", "去ai化", "改成人话", "去机器味", "降低AI率", "过AIGC检测", "长文本改写", "小说改写"
master-thesis-review
by brycewang-stanford
Generate master's thesis review reports (硕士论文评阅意见) calibrated to a given score. Outputs academic evaluation and shortcomings/suggestions in Chinese. Trigger when user says "master thesis review" / "硕士论文评阅" / "论文评阅" / "评阅意见" / "thesis review".
econ-write
by brycewang-stanford
"Expert economics paper writing assistant synthesizing advice from 50+ top guides by Cochrane, McCloskey, Shapiro, Head, Bellemare, Goldin, Glaeser, Kremer, and other leading economists. USE THIS SKILL whenever the user writes, edits, reviews, rewrites, or structures any economics paper, thesis, job market paper, abstract, introduction, conclusion, results section, literature review, or referee response. Also handles LaTeX formatting, presentations, and paper audits. Covers all paper types (applied, theory, structural, mixed) and all sections."
journal-digest
by brycewang-stanford
经济金融顶刊文献速递与选题建议生成器。通过RSS和网页抓取获取经济学、金融学、会计学顶级期刊的最新论文， 筛选公司金融相关文献，生成中文综述摘要和研究选题建议。 当用户提到"期刊速递"、"文献周报"、"论文速递"、"最新文献"、"journal digest"、"paper digest"、 "选题建议"、"研究选题"、"顶刊追踪"、"文献追踪"、"周报"时触发此技能。 即使用户只是说"帮我看看最近有什么新论文"或"最近顶刊发了什么"，也应该触发。
deep-research
by brycewang-stanford
"Universal deep research agent team. 13-agent pipeline for rigorous academic research on any topic. 7 modes: full research, quick brief, paper review, lit-review, fact-check, Socratic guided research dialogue, and systematic review with optional meta-analysis. Covers research question formulation, Socratic mentoring, methodology design, systematic literature search, source verification, cross-source synthesis, risk of bias assessment, meta-analysis, APA 7.0 report compilation, editorial review, devil's advocate challenges, ethics review, and post-research literature monitoring. Triggers on: research, deep research, literature review, systematic review, meta-analysis, PRISMA, evidence synthesis, fact-check, guide my research, help me think through, 研究, 深度研究, 文獻回顧, 文獻探討, 系統性回顧, 後設分析, 事實查核, 引導我的研究, 幫我釐清, 幫我想想, 我不確定要研究什麼, 研究方向, 研究主題."