"Interview the user relentlessly about a plan or design until reaching shared understanding, resolving each branch of the decision tree. Use when user wants to stress-test a plan, get grilled on their design, or mentions 'grill me', 'grill with docs', 'stress-test against docs'. Two modes: plain grill (one question at a time, recommended answers) and docs-anchored grill (challenges the plan against CONTEXT.md glossary and docs/adr/ records, updating them inline)."
Resources
4Install
npx skillscat add youlianvr/oper-share/grill-me Install via the SkillsCat registry.
Grill Me
Derived from Matt Pocock's grill-me (MIT). Matt's interview discipline preserved verbatim. v2.0: docs-anchored mode merged in from Matt's
grill-with-docs(MIT) — CONTEXT.md/ADR anchoring plus 3 stdlib validators. Two modes, one skill.
Interview me relentlessly about every aspect of this plan until we reach a shared understanding. Walk down each branch of the design tree, resolving dependencies between decisions one-by-one. For each question, provide your recommended answer.
Ask the questions one at a time.
If a question can be answered by exploring the codebase, explore the codebase instead.
Mode Selection
| Trigger | Mode |
|---|---|
| "grill me", stress-test a plan/design, /cs:grill-me | plain — walk the decision tree, no doc persistence |
| "grill with docs", stress-test against CONTEXT.md/ADR, /cs:grill-with-docs | docs-anchored — same interview + challenge glossary, update CONTEXT.md/ADR inline |
Rules (preserved + amplified)
- One question per turn. Never bundle.
- Provide a recommended answer with each question. Defaulting to "what do you think?" is lazy.
- Explore the codebase before asking. If
grep/Readresolves it, do that first. Saves a turn. - Walk the tree depth-first. Finish a branch before opening another.
- Track dependencies. If decision B depends on decision A, ask A first.
Workflow (plain mode)
- User provides a plan or design (or path to one).
- Run
scripts/decision_tree_extractor.pyto extract branches. - Run
scripts/question_generator.pyto produce the question list with recommendations. - Start a session:
scripts/grill_session_tracker.py --action start. - Walk the tree, one question at a time, recording answers in the session.
- When all branches resolved: report "shared understanding reached" + the locked-in decisions.
Workflow (docs-anchored mode)
The same interview loop, plus documentation anchoring. During codebase exploration also look for existing documentation:
/
├── CONTEXT.md ← domain glossary (the language of the project)
├── docs/
│ └── adr/
│ ├── 0001-event-sourced-orders.md
│ └── 0002-postgres-for-write-model.md
└── src/If a CONTEXT-MAP.md exists at the root, the repo has multiple contexts — the map points to where each one lives. Create files lazily: only when you have something to write. If no CONTEXT.md exists, create one when the first term is resolved. If no docs/adr/ exists, create it when the first ADR is needed.
0. Pre-flight (before the first question)
- Run
scripts/context_md_linter.py CONTEXT.mdif aCONTEXT.mdexists — confirms the glossary is well-formed before grilling against it. - Run
scripts/adr_scanner.py docs/adr/ifdocs/adr/exists — surfaces numbering gaps, malformed ADRs, status-frontmatter inconsistencies. - Run
scripts/glossary_code_consistency.py --context CONTEXT.md --code src/— flags defined-but-unused terms (dead glossary) and code-only common nouns that may need definitions. Use these flags as opening grill questions.
During the session
- Challenge against the glossary: when the user uses a term that conflicts with the existing language in
CONTEXT.md, call it out immediately. "Your glossary defines 'cancellation' as X, but you seem to mean Y — which is it?" - Sharpen fuzzy language: when the user uses vague or overloaded terms, propose a precise canonical term. "You're saying 'account' — do you mean the Customer or the User?"
- Discuss concrete scenarios: stress-test domain relationships with specific scenarios that probe edge cases and force precision about boundaries.
- Cross-reference with code: when the user states how something works, check whether the code agrees. Surface contradictions: "Your code cancels entire Orders, but you just said partial cancellation is possible — which is right?"
- Update CONTEXT.md inline: when a term is resolved, update
CONTEXT.mdright there (format in CONTEXT-FORMAT.md). Don't batch — capture as they happen.CONTEXT.mdis a glossary and nothing else: no implementation details, not a spec, not a scratch pad. - Offer ADRs sparingly: only when all three are true — (1) hard to reverse, (2) surprising without context, (3) the result of a real trade-off. If any is missing, skip the ADR. Format in ADR-FORMAT.md.
- When a term is sharpened: edit
CONTEXT.mdimmediately; re-runcontext_md_linter.pyif the edit is structural. When an ADR is warranted: write it underdocs/adr/; re-runadr_scanner.pyto confirm numbering.
Closing
- Final
glossary_code_consistency.pyrun to confirm no new orphan terms were introduced. - Summarize: terms added/refined, ADRs written, scenarios discussed, open items.
Output Pattern
Per question turn (both modes):
Q[i]/[total]: [question]
Recommended answer: [your call + 1-sentence rationale]
(Or: I explored the codebase and found [evidence]. Confirm?)Tooling
See references/companion_tooling.md. Tools: extractor + generator + tracker (plain mode), linter + scanner + consistency (docs mode). Agents: cs-grill-master, cs-grill-with-docs. Commands: /cs:grill-me, /cs:grill-with-docs.
Plain-mode tools
| Tool | Role |
|---|---|
scripts/decision_tree_extractor.py |
Extract decision branches from a plan |
scripts/question_generator.py |
Produce question list with recommendations |
scripts/grill_session_tracker.py |
Track session state and recorded answers |
Docs-mode tools (stdlib-only)
| Tool | Role |
|---|---|
scripts/context_md_linter.py |
Validate CONTEXT.md against CONTEXT-FORMAT.md structure. PASS/WARN/FAIL per rule. |
scripts/adr_scanner.py |
Walk docs/adr/, check NNNN-slug.md pattern, numbering integrity, body completeness. |
scripts/glossary_code_consistency.py |
Cross-reference bold terms in CONTEXT.md against codebase usage. Flag dead glossary + code-only common nouns. |
References
references/companion_tooling.md— extraction/generation/tracking tools + cs-* wrapperreferences/forcing_question_patterns.md— forcing-question libraryreferences/when_to_stop_grilling.md— "shared understanding" stopping conditionsreferences/ubiquitous_language.md— why a glossary belongs in source control (Evans, Vernon, Khononov, Wlaschin, Brandolini, Avram & Marinescu, Fowler)references/adr_practice.md— when an ADR earns its keep (Nygard, Tyree & Akerman, Zimmermann Y-statements, MADR, ThoughtWorks Radar, adr-tools, Backstage)references/context_md_as_artifact.md— CONTEXT.md as living artifact (Khononov on language drift, Kernighan on naming, BoundedContext bliki, Confluent on data contracts, Brandolini on EventStorming glossary)ADR-FORMAT.md,CONTEXT-FORMAT.md— file format specs for docs-anchored mode
Version: 2.0.0
Derived: Matt Pocock grill-me + grill-with-docs (both MIT) + this repo's wrapper