Ask Questions If Underspecified

Goal

Ask the minimum set of clarifying questions needed to avoid wrong work.
Do not start implementing until must-have questions are answered, unless the user explicitly asks to proceed with assumptions.

---

Non-negotiables

• Do not run commands or edit files while must-have unknowns remain.
• Prefer repo-local truth over guesses.
• If REPO_PROFILE.json exists, do not ask questions it already answers (stack, paths, commands, quality bar).
• Do not contradict repo governance (AGENTS/CALIBRATION) if present.
• Use only when explicitly invoked.

---

Workflow

1) Decide whether the request is underspecified

Treat a request as underspecified if, after exploring how to perform the work, any of the following are unclear:

• Objective (what should change vs stay the same)
• Done (acceptance criteria, examples, edge cases)
• Scope (which files/components/users are in/out)
• Constraints (compatibility, performance, style, deps, time)
• Safety/reversibility (migration, rollout/rollback, risk)

Environment/tooling questions are underspecified only if REPO_PROFILE.json is missing.

If multiple plausible interpretations exist, assume it is underspecified.

2) Ask must-have questions first (keep it small)

Ask 1–5 questions in the first pass. Prefer questions that eliminate whole branches of work.

Make questions easy to answer:

• Short, numbered questions
• Multiple-choice where possible
• Suggest defaults (clearly marked)
• Provide a fast-path response (defaults)
• Allow compact answers like 1b 2a 3c and restate chosen options

3) Pause before acting

Until must-have answers arrive:

• Do not run commands, edit files, or produce a detailed plan that depends on unknowns.
• You may do low-risk discovery only if it does not commit to a direction (inspect repo structure, read configs/docs).

If the user explicitly asks to proceed without answers:

• State assumptions as a short numbered list
• Proceed under those assumptions without further questioning

4) Confirm interpretation, then hand off

Once you have answers:

• Restate requirements in 1–3 sentences including constraints and success criteria
• Recommend the next skill to invoke (usually $create-plan or an implementation skill)

---

Question templates

• "Before I start, I need: (1) ..., (2) ..., (3) .... If you don't care about (2), I will assume ...."
• "Which should it be? A) ... B) ... C) ... (pick one)"
• "What would you consider 'done'? For example: ..."
• "Any constraints (versions, performance, style, deps)? If none, I will target project defaults."

1) Scope?
a) Minimal change (default)
b) Refactor while touching the area
c) Not sure - use default

2) Compatibility target?
a) Current project defaults (default)
b) Also support older versions: <specify>
c) Not sure - use default

Reply with: defaults (or 1a 2a)