- Cross-reference with existing repo skills (e.g., use `insights` skill after research to extract patterns)
Install
npx skillscat add strikersam/autonomous-ai-agency/agents-skills-research Install via the SkillsCat registry.
SKILL.md
Skill: Research
Purpose
Conduct structured, systematic research on any topic — synthesizing sources, extracting key findings, identifying gaps, and producing a clear research brief. Designed for both technical and non-technical research tasks.
When to Use
- Investigating a new technology, library, or approach before implementation
- Competitive analysis or market research
- Literature review before writing documentation or proposals
- Due diligence on a tool, service, or vendor
- Pre-planning research before starting a feature
Instructions
Step 1: Define the Research Question
Before searching, clarify:
- Primary question: What is the core thing you need to know?
- Scope: How deep? How broad? Time constraints?
- Output type: Decision brief? Technical summary? Comparison table?
- Audience: Who will read this? What do they already know?
Step 2: Identify Source Categories
Structure the research across these source types:
- Official docs / primary sources — authoritative, current
- Community knowledge — GitHub issues, forums, Stack Overflow
- Comparisons / reviews — third-party analysis
- Case studies / examples — real-world usage
- Critiques / limitations — known problems, caveats
Step 3: Extract & Synthesize
For each source:
- Record the key claim or finding
- Note the source credibility and recency
- Flag contradictions between sources
- Identify consensus vs. contested points
Step 4: Identify Gaps
Document what you couldn't find or what remains uncertain:
- Missing data points
- Questions that need primary research (e.g., direct testing)
- Assumptions that need validation
Step 5: Produce Research Brief
## Research Brief: [Topic]
**Date:** [Date]
**Researcher:** Claude
**Question:** [Primary research question]
---
### Executive Summary
[2–3 sentences: what was found and what it means]
### Key Findings
1. [Finding] — Source: [URL or description] (Confidence: High/Medium/Low)
2. ...
### Comparison / Options (if applicable)
| Option | Pros | Cons | Best For |
|--------|------|------|----------|
| ... | ... | ... | ... |
### Gaps & Uncertainties
- [What remains unknown]
- [What needs direct testing]
### Recommendation
[Clear recommendation based on findings, with rationale]
### Sources
- [Source 1]: [URL or description]
- [Source 2]: ...Example Prompt to Trigger
/research
Topic: [what to research]
Question: [specific question to answer]
Output: [decision brief / comparison / summary]Output Format
- Structured research brief in markdown
- Executive summary at the top
- Comparison tables where options exist
- Clear recommendation with rationale
- Sources listed at the bottom
Notes
- Always distinguish between facts (verifiable), claims (stated by sources), and opinions (subjective assessments)
- Flag information older than 2 years as potentially outdated
- If web browsing is available, use it; otherwise synthesize from provided content
- For technical research in this repo, consider saving to
docs/research/[topic]-YYYY-MM-DD.md - Cross-reference with existing repo skills (e.g., use
insightsskill after research to extract patterns)