runkids

feature-radar-learn

Extract reusable patterns, architectural decisions, and pitfalls from completed work into .feature-radar/specs/. Captures the "why" behind choices so future sessions build on past experience. MUST use this skill when the user reflects on what worked/didn't, wants to document a decision, or mentions remembering a pattern for future use. Use when the user: - Says "remember this approach", "document this decision", "save this pattern" - Reflects: "that worked well", "lessons learned", "what did we learn" - Wants to capture: "don't forget this", "this was a good pattern" - Hit a dead end: "this didn't work because...", "avoid this approach" - Made a technical decision worth recording for posterity - Says "extract learnings" or "capture what we learned" Do NOT use for recording external observations — that's feature-radar-ref's job. Do NOT use for archiving completed features — that's feature-radar-archive's job.

runkids 10 3 Updated 2mo ago

Resources

1
GitHub

Install

npx skillscat add runkids/my-skills/feature-radar-learn

Install via the SkillsCat registry.

SKILL.md

Extract Learnings

Capture reusable knowledge from completed work into .feature-radar/specs/.

Deep Read

Read and follow `../feature-radar/references/DEEP-READ.md` — complete all 6 steps before proceeding.

Behavioral Directives

Read and follow `../feature-radar/references/DIRECTIVES.md`.

Workflow

  1. Identify the source — ask the user what was just completed (feature, bug fix, refactor, investigation)
  2. Analyze the work — review recent commits, changed files, and implementation decisions
  3. Extract knowledge — identify what's reusable:
    • Patterns: recurring solutions worth replicating (e.g., "three-tier config merge")
    • Decisions: architectural choices with rationale (e.g., "YAML over JSON because...")
    • Pitfalls: mistakes or dead ends others should avoid
    • Techniques: implementation approaches that worked well
Before writing to specs/, classify each piece of knowledge into exactly one category: - **Pattern**: recurring solution worth replicating - **Decision**: architectural choice with rationale - **Pitfall**: mistake or dead end to avoid - **Technique**: implementation approach that worked well

State the classification explicitly in your output.

  1. Write to specs — create or append to .feature-radar/specs/{topic}.md
  2. Checkpoint — State what was written and ask: "I've written to specs/{topic}.md ({classification type}). Does this look correct, or should I adjust anything?" Wait for user confirmation before proceeding.
  3. Update base.md — increment the specs count in Tracking Summary

File Format

Use the format defined in ../feature-radar/references/SPEC.md § 3.4 (specs/{topic}.md).

Guidelines

  • One topic per file. If the learning spans multiple topics, create multiple files.
  • Name files by the pattern, not by the feature that produced it.
    • Good: yaml-config-merge.md, symlink-vs-copy-tradeoffs.md
    • Bad: audit-feature-learnings.md, v2-refactor-notes.md
  • Append to existing files when the new learning extends a known topic.
  • Keep it concise — future readers need the insight, not the full story.

Example Output

→ Created specs/symlink-vs-copy-tradeoffs.md (Decision)
→ Updated base.md: specs 2 → 3

Completion Summary

Follow the template in ../feature-radar/references/DIRECTIVES.md, with skill name "Learn Complete".