Disciplined change procedure — understand, implement, test, inspect diff, review, report. Prevents claiming a task is done before it has actually been verified. Use for any non-trivial code change in this repository, or when invoked directly as /ship-change.
Install
npx skillscat add mircus/metavibing/ship-change Install via the SkillsCat registry.
SKILL.md
/ship-change — Disciplined Change Procedure
Invoke with: /ship-change <task description>
This skill implements a disciplined change procedure. It prevents "Claude says done too early" — the most common MetaVibing failure mode.
Procedure
1. Understand
Before writing a single line of code:
- Restate the task in your own words.
- Identify which files are in scope.
- Identify which files are explicitly out of scope.
- State any architectural constraints that apply (from CLAUDE.md or relevant rules).
- Ask one clarifying question if the task is ambiguous — only one.
2. Implement
- Make the smallest change that satisfies the task.
- Do not refactor unrelated code.
- Do not touch files outside the stated scope.
3. Test
- Run the relevant test suite.
- If no tests exist for the changed behavior, write at least one.
- If tests fail, fix them before proceeding.
- Distinguish pre-existing failures from newly introduced ones.
4. Inspect diff
Run:
git diffVerify:
- No unintended files were modified.
- No debug code, commented-out blocks, or TODO stubs were left in.
- No secrets or local config were included.
5. Review
Read through the diff as if you are a critical reviewer who did not write the code. Ask:
- Does this actually solve the task?
- Does it introduce any new bugs or regressions?
- Is it consistent with the project's architectural conventions?
For non-trivial changes, delegate this step to the final-reviewer subagent instead of self-reviewing.
6. Report
Write a concise completion report:
## Change: <task>
**Files changed:** <list>
**Tests run:** <pass/fail summary>
**Diff size:** +N / -N lines
**Notes:** <anything the human should know>What This Prevents
| Failure | How this skill prevents it |
|---|---|
| Claiming done without running tests | Step 3 is explicit and required |
| Touching unrelated files | Step 1 scopes the work; Step 4 inspects for drift |
| Forgetting to report | Step 6 is non-optional |
| Missing architectural violations | Step 5 catches them via explicit review |