"Surface the USER's unknown-unknowns before they work in unfamiliar territory — an unfamiliar codebase area OR an unfamiliar domain vocabulary — and coach a sharper prompt. Scans for gaps the user's framing missed, emits one blindspot card per gap (the gap, why it matters here, a copyable prompt-fix line), then assembles the fixes into one improved implementation prompt. Use when: 'what am I missing', 'find my blindspots', 'what do I not know here', 'sharpen this prompt', 'I am new to this area', or about to work somewhere you do not know well and the goal is a better prompt — not the codebase handoff artifact /discovery:explore produces."
Resources
1Install
npx skillscat add melodic-software/claude-code-plugins/plugins-discovery-skills-blindspot Install via the SkillsCat registry.
Pre-computed context
Current branch: !git branch --show-current 2>/dev/null || echo "unknown"
Project root: !git rev-parse --show-toplevel 2>/dev/null || echo "unknown"
These values orient this session only; resolve files against the project root while working.
Purpose
Every mode of /discovery:explore builds the AGENT's local knowledge and hands off an EXPLORE.md
artifact. Blindspot mode builds the USER's knowledge and hands off a better prompt — a different
audience and a different deliverable, which is why it is its own skill.
Run it when the user is about to work in territory they don't know — an unfamiliar codebase area OR
an unfamiliar domain vocabulary — and the goal is to surface what their framing didn't account for
so they can write a sharper implementation prompt. The output is calibrated to the user's disclosed
starting point, not to a fixed depth.
Local counterpart discipline to /discovery:explore (what IS in the codebase) and /discovery:research
(what SHOULD BE from external sources): blindspot borrows from both lanes but serves the user's
understanding rather than the agent's.
Workflow
- Intake — ask the user's starting point first (one question). Blindspot output calibrates to
that disclosure — what they already know bounds which gaps are worth surfacing. - Scan — two lanes, chosen by what is unfamiliar:
- Codebase lane — read the target area (the codebase-reading, git-history, and project-structure
dimensions of `${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/explore/SKILL.md`)
looking specifically for things the user's framing missed: existing patterns they'd duplicate,
constraints they'd violate, historical decisions they'd re-litigate, adjacent code their change
would break. - Domain lane — build a lightweight vocabulary ladder grounded in sources fetched this session
(repo files, official docs) — never bare training recall.
- Codebase lane — read the target area (the codebase-reading, git-history, and project-structure
- Output — blindspot cards. One card per blindspot: the gap, why it matters here, and a copyable
prompt-fix line. Close by assembling the fixes into ONE improved implementation prompt the user can
run next. - Escalate when depth warranted — a domain too deep for a lightweight ladder gets a recommendation
to run proper external research (/discovery:research) or whatever structured-learning capability
the environment provides.
Output format
Present each blindspot as a card:
- Gap — the specific thing the user's current framing did not account for.
- Why it matters here — the concrete consequence in this codebase or domain, not a generic caution.
- Prompt-fix — a single copyable line the user can drop into their prompt to close the gap.
Then assemble every prompt-fix into ONE improved implementation prompt, wrapped in clear
copy-start / copy-end markers so the exact text to reuse is unambiguous.
This skill does NOT write EXPLORE.md — its deliverable is the user's understanding plus the improved
prompt. When the scan's findings also serve as stage-1 codebase exploration, offer to hand off to/discovery:explore to persist the EXPLORE.md artifact rather than
duplicating that responsibility here.
Gotchas
- Presenting training recall as domain fact — the domain lane grounds its vocabulary ladder in
sources fetched this session (repo files, official docs). Bare recall is the failure mode this
skill exists to avoid, not commit. - Surfacing the agent's gaps instead of the user's — cards name what the USER's framing missed,
calibrated to their intake disclosure, not a generic audit of the area. - Generic cautions in "why it matters" — each card's consequence is concrete to this codebase or
domain; a caution that would read the same in any repo is not a blindspot. - Writing an artifact by reflex — no
EXPLORE.mdunless the user opts into the explore handoff.
What this skill does NOT do
- Does not produce the
EXPLORE.mdhandoff — that is/discovery:explore. Hand off to it when the
findings double as stage-1 exploration. - Does not make changes — it surfaces blindspots and coaches a prompt. Execution is a separate step.
- Does not run open-ended external research — the domain lane fetches official docs to ground a
lightweight vocabulary ladder; anything deeper routes to/discovery:research.