Assess research idea novelty through systematic literature search. Multi-round search-evaluate loops with harsh critic persona. Binary novel/not-novel decision with justification. Use before committing to a research direction.
Resources
1Install
npx skillscat add lingzhi227/agent-research-skills/novelty-assessment Install via the SkillsCat registry.
We need to produce a 2-3 sentence plain-text summary, objective, factual, no marketing, no superlatives, no calls to action, natural prose, no bullet points, no headings, no markdown. At most 60 words. Must be only the summary text. We need to summarize: skill does: assess research idea novelty via systematic literature search, multi-round loops, harsh critic persona, binary decision with justification. Problem it solves: helps determine if idea is novel before committing resources. When to use: before committing to a research direction, when evaluating a research idea.
Novelty Assessment
Rigorously assess whether a research idea is novel through systematic literature search.
Input
$0— Research idea description, title, or JSON file
Scripts
Automated novelty check
python ~/.claude/skills/idea-generation/scripts/novelty_check.py \
--idea "Your research idea description" \
--max-rounds 10 --output novelty_report.jsonLiterature search
python ~/.claude/skills/deep-research/scripts/search_semantic_scholar.py \
--query "relevant search query" --max-results 10References
- Assessment prompts and criteria:
~/.claude/skills/novelty-assessment/references/assessment-prompts.md
Workflow
Step 1: Understand the Idea
- Identify the core contribution
- List the key technical components
- Determine the research area and subfield
Step 2: Multi-Round Literature Search (up to 10 rounds)
For each round:
- Generate a targeted search query
- Search Semantic Scholar / arXiv / OpenAlex
- Review top-10 results with abstracts
- Assess overlap with the idea
- Decide: need more searching, or ready to decide
Step 3: Make Decision
- Novel: After sufficient searching, no paper significantly overlaps
- Not Novel: Found a paper that significantly overlaps
Step 4: Position the Idea
If novel, identify:
- Most similar existing papers (for Related Work)
- How the idea differs from each
- The specific gap this idea fills
Harsh Critic Persona
Be a harsh critic for novelty. Ensure there is a sufficient contribution
for a new conference or workshop paper. A trivial extension of existing
work is NOT novel. The idea must offer a meaningfully different approach,
formulation, or insight.Output Format
{
"decision": "novel" | "not_novel",
"confidence": "high" | "medium" | "low",
"justification": "After searching X rounds...",
"most_similar_papers": [
{"title": "...", "year": 2024, "overlap": "..."}
],
"differentiation": "Our idea differs because..."
}Rules
- Minimum 3 search rounds before declaring novel
- Try to recall exact paper names for targeted queries
- A paper idea is NOT novel if it's a trivial extension
- Consider both methodology novelty AND application novelty
- Check for concurrent/recent arXiv submissions
Related Skills
- Upstream: literature-search, deep-research
- Downstream: idea-generation, research-planning
- See also: related-work-writing