lingzhi227

novelty-assessment

Assess research idea novelty through systematic literature search. Multi-round search-evaluate loops with harsh critic persona. Binary novel/not-novel decision with justification. Use before committing to a research direction.

lingzhi227 295 35 Updated 6mo ago

Resources

1
GitHub

Install

npx skillscat add lingzhi227/agent-research-skills/novelty-assessment

Install via the SkillsCat registry.

About this skill

We need to produce a 2-3 sentence plain-text summary, objective, factual, no marketing, no superlatives, no calls to action, natural prose, no bullet points, no headings, no markdown. At most 60 words. Must be only the summary text. We need to summarize: skill does: assess research idea novelty via systematic literature search, multi-round loops, harsh critic persona, binary decision with justification. Problem it solves: helps determine if idea is novel before committing resources. When to use: before committing to a research direction, when evaluating a research idea.

SKILL.md

Novelty Assessment

Rigorously assess whether a research idea is novel through systematic literature search.

Input

  • $0 — Research idea description, title, or JSON file

Scripts

Automated novelty check

python ~/.claude/skills/idea-generation/scripts/novelty_check.py \
  --idea "Your research idea description" \
  --max-rounds 10 --output novelty_report.json

Literature search

python ~/.claude/skills/deep-research/scripts/search_semantic_scholar.py \
  --query "relevant search query" --max-results 10

References

  • Assessment prompts and criteria: ~/.claude/skills/novelty-assessment/references/assessment-prompts.md

Workflow

Step 1: Understand the Idea

  • Identify the core contribution
  • List the key technical components
  • Determine the research area and subfield

Step 2: Multi-Round Literature Search (up to 10 rounds)

For each round:

  1. Generate a targeted search query
  2. Search Semantic Scholar / arXiv / OpenAlex
  3. Review top-10 results with abstracts
  4. Assess overlap with the idea
  5. Decide: need more searching, or ready to decide

Step 3: Make Decision

  • Novel: After sufficient searching, no paper significantly overlaps
  • Not Novel: Found a paper that significantly overlaps

Step 4: Position the Idea

If novel, identify:

  • Most similar existing papers (for Related Work)
  • How the idea differs from each
  • The specific gap this idea fills

Harsh Critic Persona

Be a harsh critic for novelty. Ensure there is a sufficient contribution
for a new conference or workshop paper. A trivial extension of existing
work is NOT novel. The idea must offer a meaningfully different approach,
formulation, or insight.

Output Format

{
  "decision": "novel" | "not_novel",
  "confidence": "high" | "medium" | "low",
  "justification": "After searching X rounds...",
  "most_similar_papers": [
    {"title": "...", "year": 2024, "overlap": "..."}
  ],
  "differentiation": "Our idea differs because..."
}

Rules

  • Minimum 3 search rounds before declaring novel
  • Try to recall exact paper names for targeted queries
  • A paper idea is NOT novel if it's a trivial extension
  • Consider both methodology novelty AND application novelty
  • Check for concurrent/recent arXiv submissions

Related Skills