Review Docs

Review and improve Syncpack documentation against project standards.

When to Use

• Validating docs before publication
• Improving existing documentation
• Ensuring consistency across pages
• User reports documentation is unclear

Related Skills

Use with:

• document-code — Reference for structure and locations
• signal-over-noise — Apply to remove filler and obvious explanations
• front-loading — Ensure actionable information comes first

Your Task

Given a documentation path, review content against standards. Suggest concrete improvements.

Quality Checklist

• Clarity: First line immediately shows what it covers
• Examples: Practical, show real use cases, cover major patterns
• Completeness: All relevant aspects documented
• Consistency: Formatting matches other docs
• Conciseness: No fluff; every sentence earns space
• Accessibility: Users find what they need without deep reading
• Reuse: Reference shared partials when available

Review Process

1. Read the documentation file
2. Cross-reference structure with similar docs
3. Identify information gaps where users might get stuck
4. Check for shared partials at site/src/_partials/
5. Apply signal-over-noise: Can you cut 20% of words without losing meaning?

Review Output

Provide structured feedback:

Current State

• Assessment of documentation quality and coverage

Issues Found

• Specific problems with locations (section names or line references)
• Prioritize by impact: clarity > completeness > polish

Recommendations

• Concrete improvements with examples
• Rewrite short sections if needed
• Flag missing content or examples
• Suggest shared partials to reuse

Priority Actions

• Top 2-3 changes to make immediately

Reference

Docs: site/src/content/docs/
Shared partials: site/src/_partials/
Source of truth: src/ (Rust implementation)
Local testing: cd site && pnpm run dev then verify at http://localhost:4321/syncpack