Test harness for Claude Code skill argument substitution — demonstrates capture-block pre-declaration, XML tag referencing, unintentional variable corruption in code blocks, and correct placement of shell examples in reference files. Use when verifying substitution behavior before applying a pattern to other skills, testing how arguments flow from skill invocations, or understanding the pre-declaration and reference file pattern with greet/farewell/inspect actions.
Resources
1Install
npx skillscat add jamie-bitflight/claude-skills/example-argument-substitution Install via the SkillsCat registry.
Argument Substitution Pattern — Example Skill
How to Use This Skill
This skill is a living test harness for argument substitution behavior. Read it, run it, observe what happened, and extend it.
Step 1 — Read this file. Do this before running. Note what you expect to see in each section.
Step 2 — Run with 0 arguments: /example-argument-substitution
Step 3 — Run with 10 arguments: /example-argument-substitution CANARY_A CANARY_B CANARY_C CANARY_D CANARY_E CANARY_F CANARY_G CANARY_H CANARY_I CANARY_J
Step 4 — Compare. Each section states what it expects. Check whether output matches.
How to Add a New Test
When you have a hypothesis about substitution behavior — test it here before applying it anywhere else.
- State your hypothesis — write exactly what you expect to appear in the output
- Add the pattern — put it in a new section below with an
**Expected with 10 args:**and**Expected with 0 args:**annotation - Run with 0 args —
/example-argument-substitution - Run with 10 CANARY args —
/example-argument-substitution CANARY_A CANARY_B ... - Observe — does the rendered output match your hypothesis exactly?
- Record the finding — if the hypothesis was wrong, correct it. If it involves literal
$Nsyntax, record the verified fact in./references/argument-substitution-reference.md(reference files are not substituted) - Only then apply the pattern to other skills
Do not document any pattern as safe without completing all 7 steps.
Compare each section below between the two runs. Some sections are intentional substitution — they should show values. Others are unintentional — they show what corruption looks like.
Capture Block (intentional substitution — should show values)
All positional args captured into named XML tags. Everything else references these tags.
$0
$1
$2
$3
$4
$5
$6
$7
$8
$9
$ARGUMENTS</all_args>
$ARGUMENTS[0]</arg_by_index_0>
$ARGUMENTS[1]</arg_by_index_1>
$ARGUMENTS[2]</arg_by_index_2>
Expected with 10 args: each tag holds its CANARY value.
Expected with 0 args: all tags empty.
Intentional Substitution in Prose (should show values)
These are correct uses of substitution — injecting argument values directly into skill output.
The skill was invoked with first argument:
The target is:
All arguments received:
A skill instruction that uses the value directly:
Process the file using mode .
Expected with 10 args: prose shows CANARY_A, CANARY_B, full CANARY string.
Expected with 0 args: blanks where the values would be — still correct for a 0-arg invocation.
Intentional Substitution Combined with Command Substitution
Command substitution runs at load time; argument substitution also runs at load time.
Both happen before Claude reads the skill. This line combines both:
!echo "Loaded at $(date '+%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S') — first arg is: $0"
Expected with 10 args: timestamp + CANARY_A on the same line.
Expected with 0 args: timestamp + empty string after first arg is:.
Unintentional Substitution — Code Examples (shows corruption)
This section intentionally demonstrates what corruption looks like when you write
shell code examples in SKILL.md body. The variables below are consumed at load time.
A bash function you might want to document:
check_file() {
local path=$1
local mode=$2
[[ -f $1 ]] && chmod $2 $1
}Expected with 10 args: $1 → CANARY_A, $2 → CANARY_B — code is corrupted.
Expected with 0 args: $1 → empty, $2 → empty — also corrupted, differently.
Brace form is equally substituted:
process() {
echo "arg: ${1}, mode: ${2}"
}Expected with 10 args: ${1} → CANARY_A, ${2} → CANARY_B — brace form is NOT safe.
Expected with 0 args: both render empty — still corrupted.
Awk field references in single quotes are also substituted:
awk '{print $5, $1}' file.txtExpected with 10 args: $5 → CANARY_F, $1 → CANARY_A — awk example is broken.
Expected with 0 args: both disappear — single quotes provide no protection.
The Correct Pattern — Pre-Declaration + Reference File
For prose and output strings: use substitution directly (as shown in the Intentional sections above).
For code examples containing shell variables: move them to a reference file.
Reference files are NOT subject to substitution and can show literal $1, ${1}, $ARGUMENTS syntax safely.
The pre-declaration pattern for routing skills:
- Capture args into XML tags at the very top of SKILL.md (as in the Capture Block above)
- Use
<tagname>throughout the rest of SKILL.md — never bare$Nafter the capture block - Put all code examples with
$Ninreferences/*.md
Routing (uses <arg0> as action — correct pattern)
flowchart TD
Start(["Read <arg0>"]) --> Q{arg0 value?}
Q -->|"greet"| Greet["Say hello to <arg1>"]
Q -->|"farewell"| Farewell["Say goodbye to <arg1>"]
Q -->|"inspect"| Inspect["Show all captured values"]
Q -->|"(empty)"| Help["Output usage line"]
Q -->|"(anything else)"| Unknown["Output: Unknown action. Valid: greet, farewell, inspect"]Actions
greet
Trigger: <arg0> is greet
Output:
Hello, <arg1>!
(invoked as: <all_args>)If <arg1> is empty, substitute world.
farewell
Trigger: <arg0> is farewell
Output:
Goodbye, <arg1>. It was a pleasure.
(invoked as: <all_args>)If <arg1> is empty, substitute friend.
inspect
Trigger: <arg0> is inspect
Output all captured values:
arg0 = <arg0>
arg1 = <arg1>
arg2 = <arg2>
arg3 = <arg3>
arg4 = <arg4>
arg5 = <arg5>
arg6 = <arg6>
arg7 = <arg7>
arg8 = <arg8>
arg9 = <arg9>
all_args = <all_args>
arg_by_index_0 = <arg_by_index_0>
arg_by_index_1 = <arg_by_index_1>
arg_by_index_2 = <arg_by_index_2>Full Reference
All substitution variables, pitfall table, and verified escape evidence: