Review Otto Vault repository documentation specifically for citation precision, claim-to-source support, source hierarchy, invented examples, stale contradictions, coverage-status evidence, and honest uncertainty. Use as a focused post-scan reviewer; do not author or repair docs.
Resources
4Install
npx skillscat add itzikiusa/otto-os/vault-evidence-review Install via the SkillsCat registry.
SKILL.md
Vault Evidence Review
Use when a completed Vault scan needs a read-only claim-to-source audit.
Workflow
- Read checklist.md.
- Run OKF validation; reconcile index entries and internal links; inspect
diagram fences for valid source/render structure. Inspect every coverage
exception and all load-bearing claims. Sample
additional claims across API, data, and runtime concepts; expand if a sample
exposes systematic citation drift. - Open each cited location and decide whether it directly supports the claim.
Prefer executable source/migrations over tests, generated contracts, config,
and prose. Record contradictions rather than choosing convenient evidence. - Reconcile examples with their source types/fixtures and verify non-Markdown
artifacts agree with the linked concepts. - Emit only the finding JSON array or
[]. Re-review repaired claims during
later iterations without repeating resolved findings.
Caller focus chooses claims to prioritize, not a lower proof threshold. Do not
use for citation formatting alone, initial authoring, or general code review.
Output contract
Output only the shared JSON finding array; an empty clean verdict is exactly [].
Non-trigger example
Do not use merely to reformat citations without checking their claims.