Innei

session-handoff

Produce a self-contained handoff prompt for another agent (Codex, a fresh Claude session, a teammate) when the user wants to delegate continued work. Triggers on: "写一个 prompt 给 codex"、"交接一下"、"让 xxx 跟进"、"summary 一下再写个 prompt"、"handoff to another agent"、"write a prompt so X can continue", or any request to capture the current session state for continuation elsewhere.

Innei 78 2 Updated 4mo ago
GitHub

Install

npx skillscat add innei/skill/session-handoff

Install via the SkillsCat registry.

About this skill

This skill generates a self-contained handoff prompt for delegating work to another agent, ensuring continuity without user re-engagement. It solves the problem of context loss when transferring tasks between sessions or agents. Use it when explicitly delegating work, pausing to capture state, or needing a summary for external continuation.

SKILL.md

session-handoff

Write a handoff prompt that lets a cold receiving agent continue the current
work without re-asking the user for context. The receiving agent has zero
knowledge of this session — the prompt must be self-contained.

When to invoke

  • User explicitly asks to hand off: "让 codex 跟进", "write a prompt for X",
    "交接给 xxx".
  • User asks for a session summary that will be forwarded to another agent.
  • User wants to pause and capture state for later continuation.

Do not invoke when the user just wants a status update or a summary for
themselves
— those are conversational, this produces a delegation artifact.

Required sections

The output is a single Markdown document the user will copy and paste. It
must contain the following sections, in order, with the section titles as
written (Chinese / English mix is fine — match whatever the rest of the
session is using):

  1. 用户与环境 / User & Environment

    • Who the user is (name, handle, role) and contact if known.
    • Working directory, current branch, target merge branch.
    • Local services / databases (host, port, db name, credentials) the
      receiving agent will need. Redact .env contents and cloud tokens.
    • Dev workflow commands actually in use (bun run dev:spa, pnpm xxx,
      etc.).
    • User preferences and hard constraints (git rules, commit conventions,
      "do not touch" list, lint/test scoping rules, output style).
  2. 当前正在处理的事项 / Current Task

    • Top-level goal in 1–2 sentences.
    • The current blocker or open question.
    • If a previous approach was abandoned, say why so the receiver
      doesn't retry it.
  3. 本会话已完成的工作 / History

    • Chronological or grouped bullets.
    • Each bullet names: what changed, which files/lines, the rationale, and
      any user feedback that shaped the decision.
    • Include deprecations/migrations touched, not just additions.
  4. 下一步待做 / Next Steps

    • Numbered, concrete actions.
    • For each: files to touch, the specific change, and any preconditions.
    • Inline open questions that the receiver must ask the user before
      committing.
    • State which path you recommend and why, so the receiver can challenge
      the recommendation instead of rediscovering it.
  5. 关键文件速查 / Key Files Index

    • Grouped by concern (UI / services / server / schema / packages / tests).
    • One line per file explaining its role in this task.
  6. 调试 / 验证方法 / Debug & Verification

    • Exact shell commands to verify state (DB queries, log filters, curl
      invocations).
    • The test scenarios that should pass before shipping.
    • How to reproduce the original bug (if applicable).
  7. 需要用户定夺的点 / Open Decisions

    • Policy or UX questions the receiving agent must NOT silently choose.
    • Phrase each as a question with the options already identified.

Writing rules

  • Self-contained. No phrases like "as we discussed earlier" or "per the
    previous exchange". Inline the context.
  • Concrete over abstract. "改 foo.ts:42MAX_RETRIES 从 3 到 5" beats
    "tune retry behavior".
  • Backticks around file paths, commands, identifiers, and DB rows.
  • Line numbers whenever referencing a specific location — paths alone rot
    less, but line numbers make the handoff immediately actionable.
  • Shell blocks for DB queries, gh commands, bunx invocations. Use
    real, pasteable snippets; don't pseudocode.
  • Quote user feedback verbatim when it shaped a decision — the receiver
    needs to know what the user said literally, not a paraphrase.
  • No filler. Skip "this was a great discussion", emoji, or apology prose.
  • Redact secrets. .env, tokens, API keys never go into the prompt. If
    the receiver needs them, tell them to ask the user.

Presentation to the user

  • Do not emit the handoff prompt inline in chat. Write it to a file
    instead, then open that file for the user.
  • Steps, in order:
    1. Generate a random filename under the system temp directory, e.g.
      /tmp/session-handoff-<random>.md (use a short unique token — timestamp,
      uuidgen | head -c 8, $RANDOM, etc.). Avoid collisions with existing
      files.
    2. Use the Write file tool to write the full handoff prompt (Markdown,
      all required sections) to that path. Do not wrap the content in an
      outer fenced code block — the file is the artifact.
    3. Run open <path> (macOS) via the shell tool to open the file in the
      user's default Markdown viewer/editor.
    4. Reply with exactly OK — no preface, no summary, no path echo, no
      fenced block of the content. The file + open call is the delivery.
  • Do not execute the handoff yourself (don't spawn the other agent). Your
    job is to produce the artifact file.

Quality bar

Before emitting, check:

  • Could a cold teammate start from this prompt and work for an hour
    without needing to ask the user anything other than the listed Open
    Decisions?
  • Are all file paths real? No invented paths.
  • Are user-visible decisions and trade-offs preserved, not averaged out?
  • Are there concrete shell commands in the debug section?
  • Did any secret sneak in? Scan for tokens, passwords, DSNs.

If any answer is "no", revise before showing to the user.