Review Task: TDD Executable Specification

You are reviewing a TDD (Test-Driven Development) executable specification for a component. This spec will guide the implementation of this component.

Your Task

Perform a comprehensive review of the attached specification document. Focus on identifying:

1. TDD Alignment

• Does the spec prescribe implementation details (bad) or describe behavior (good)?
• Are test names clear and executable without implementation hints?
• Does the spec allow design to emerge through tests?
• Are there any structural prescriptions that should be removed?

2. Completeness & Consistency

• Are all collaborator interactions consistently tested across all events?
• Do all events that change state have ServiceCode Resolution tests?
• Do all events that query selections have Selection Query Interaction tests?
• Is the test pattern consistent across sections (State Transitions → Selection Query → List Triangulation → ServiceCode Resolution)?
• Are there any missing test scenarios?

3. Clarity & Precision

• Is terminology used consistently throughout?
• Are section names and test names unambiguous?
• Do the test names clearly communicate what behavior is being verified?
• Are there vague phrases like "when applicable" that need clarification?
• Are notes and explanations in the right places?

4. Requirements vs Implementation

• Are requirements clearly separated from implementation details?
• Is it clear what's the reducer's responsibility vs the collaborator's responsibility?
• Are constraints properly documented?
• Is the default resolution logic appropriately placed (as collaborator's concern)?

5. Redundancy & Contradictions

• Are there any redundant statements?
• Do any sections contradict each other?
• Are concepts repeated unnecessarily?
• Could any sections be consolidated?

6. Missing Elements

• Are there critical behaviors not covered by tests?
• Are edge cases addressed?
• Are failure scenarios tested?
• Are there implicit assumptions that should be explicit?

7. Test Organization

• Is the grouping of tests logical?
• Are subsections properly used?
• Is it easy to find related tests?
• Would the test file structure emerging from this spec be maintainable?

Output Format

Provide your review as:

1. Summary: Overall assessment (Ready / Needs Minor Fixes / Needs Major Revision)

2. Critical Issues: Show-stoppers that must be fixed before implementation

3. Important Issues: Significant problems that should be addressed

4. Minor Issues: Nice-to-haves and polish items

5. Strengths: What the spec does well

For each issue:

• Quote the relevant section with line numbers
• Explain the problem clearly
• Suggest a specific fix

Context

This is a truly TDD specification - the team wants to discover design through tests, not implement a predetermined structure. The spec documents:

• WHAT behavior is required (good)
• NOT HOW to implement it (bad if present)

The component uses:

• Reducer pattern (state machine)
• Synchronous collaborators (queries and resolvers)
• Prefetched data (no async operations)

Be thorough, precise, and constructive in your feedback.