postmortem
Reflect on the current session and propose polish/tweaks/fixes for a named skill, grounded in evidence from this conversation. Use when wrapping up a session that exercised a skill — to capture what worked, what should be fixed, and what adjacent skills were missing. Sibling to skill-conventions, but session-scoped instead of corpus-scoped.
Install
npx skillscat add igor1309/ai-labs/postmortem Install via the SkillsCat registry.
Postmortem
Based on this session, what is your take on $ARGUMENTS — does it need some polish/tweaks/fixes? What other skills might it be worth adding/tweaking?
If $ARGUMENTS is empty, ask the user which skill(s) to review before proceeding.
Ground every observation in something that actually happened in this session: a place the skill helped, a place it should have helped but didn't, a place it gave wrong guidance, or a gap you had to work around. Do not invent generic "best practice" suggestions.
Structure the response as:
- Verdict — one line: solid as-is / needs polish / needs fixes / needs redesign.
- What worked — concrete moments the skill earned its keep.
- What to polish/fix — specific edits (file:line if known), with the session evidence that motivates each.
- Adjacent skills worth adding or tweaking — only if a real gap surfaced in this session. Name the skill, the gap, and the trigger that should invoke it.
Be terse. No filler, no hedging, no "great question."
Categories
Install
npx skillscat add igor1309/ai-labs/postmortem Install via the SkillsCat registry.