harperreed

snowball-content

Use when turning a single topic into a full content plan with multiple angles, formats, and a publishing calendar. Triggers on "content plan", "content calendar", "snowball method", "turn one topic into many posts", "content multiplication", "30 days of content", "content from one idea".

harperreed 332 47 Updated 4mo ago

Resources

1
GitHub

Install

npx skillscat add harperreed/dotfiles/snowball-content

Install via the SkillsCat registry.

SKILL.md

The Snowball Method

Turn 1 topic into 40+ content pieces across platforms using a 4-prompt sequential pipeline.

The Pipeline

This is a sequential 4-prompt process. Each prompt builds on the previous output. Do NOT skip steps or combine them.

digraph snowball {
  rankdir=TB;
  core [label="Prompt 1: THE CORE\nAsk clarifying questions FIRST\nthen define the core problem"];
  angles [label="Prompt 2: ANGLES & HEADLINES\n7 unexpected angles from core\neach with hooks, facts, controversy"];
  branches [label="Prompt 3: BRANCHES\n3 subtopics per angle\n3 formats per subtopic"];
  calendar [label="Prompt 4: 30-DAY CALENDAR\nPlatform-adapted posts\nwith metrics and distribution"];

  core -> angles;
  angles -> branches;
  branches -> calendar;
}

Prompt 1: THE CORE

You MUST ask clarifying questions before producing output. Do not skip this.

Ask about:

  • Goal (what outcome does this content serve?)
  • Target audience (who specifically?)
  • Pain points (what keeps them up at night?)
  • Constraints (budget, team size, tools available?)
  • Tone (professional, casual, provocative, educational?)
  • Platforms (Threads, Reels, TikTok, LinkedIn, email, YouTube?)

After receiving answers, deliver:

Deliverable Spec
Core problem One specific problem people discuss and share
Why it matters 2-3 sharp sentences
30-day content goals Measurable outcomes (saves, leads, shares — not vanity metrics)
ICP table See format below

ICP Table Format:

Who What they want What blocks them Their language Triggers Taboos

Be specific. Generic personas ("busy professionals") fail. Use language the audience actually uses.

Prompt 2: ANGLES & HEADLINES

Generate 7 unexpected angles from the core problem. Each angle must be:

  • Counterintuitive, OR
  • "You're doing it wrong", OR
  • Myth vs reality, OR
  • Hidden cost of the usual solution

For each angle, provide ALL of these:

Element Constraint
2 hooks Each ≤12 words, platform-ready (Threads/Reels)
1 core insight ≤80 words
1 number/fact With source citation — see Credibility Gate below
1 controversial statement Designed to spark comments

Credibility Gate (mandatory for every angle's number/fact):

Write exactly one line in this form:

Source: [publication/study/author, year] — [one-sentence fact]

Fail condition: If no verifiable source exists for the claimed fact, the angle is blocked. Do not proceed with that angle until a real source is supplied. Generate a replacement angle if needed.

The 7 angles must not overlap. If two angles feel similar, cut one and find something sharper.

Prompt 3: BRANCHES

For each of the 7 angles, create 3 subtopics. Each subtopic must pass the Cliche Inversion Gate before proceeding:

Cliche Inversion Gate (mandatory for every subtopic):

  1. Write a one-sentence "Obvious Version" — the cliche take a mediocre writer would produce on this subtopic.
  2. Write a one-sentence "Inversion Statement" in this exact form: "Unlike [obvious version], this subtopic argues/shows [specific contradiction]."
  3. If the Inversion Statement cannot be completed with a concrete contradiction (a negation like "not X" does not count — it must assert something specific and different), the subtopic is rejected. Generate a replacement and repeat.

Show both sentences inline before presenting each subtopic's formats. A reviewer must be able to verify the gate passed without knowing the method.

For each subtopic that passes the gate, create 3 formats:

Format 1: Educational

  • Hook (≤2 lines)
  • Insight (≤80 words)
  • 3 concrete "do this today" steps

Format 2: Provocative

  • Debatable hook
  • 3 supporting proofs
  • Question at the end (drives comments)

Format 3: Case Study

  • Context (situation before)
  • Action (what changed)
  • Numbers (measurable result)
  • Takeaway (one sentence)

If data is missing for case studies, ask the user — do not fabricate numbers.

Prompt 4: 30-DAY CALENDAR

For each piece of content from Prompt 3, adapt for the user's specified platforms:

  • Adjust length per platform norms
  • Specify visual format (carousel, reel, text post, thread, etc.)
  • Include a CTA appropriate to the platform
  • Define a success metric for each post

Build the calendar as a table:

Date Platform Topic Angle Format Goal/Metric Distribution Notes

Calendar rules:

  • Remove repetition — no two posts should feel like the same take
  • Alternate topics to avoid audience fatigue
  • Note repurposing opportunities (clips, carousels from long-form, etc.)
  • Front-load problem-awareness content, back-load solution content

Common Mistakes

Mistake Fix
Generic angles "5 tips for X" is not an angle. Push for counterintuitive, myth-busting, or hidden-cost framing.
Inversion Statement that merely negates "Unlike X, this shows not-X" fails the gate. The contradiction must assert something specific.