ALWAYS use this skill when writing or refactoring code. Includes context-dependent sub-skills to empower different coding styles across languages and runtimes.
Install
npx skillscat add ed3dai/ed3d-plugins/coding-effectively Install via the SkillsCat registry.
This skill provides structured coding practices for writing and refactoring code across languages and runtimes. It solves the problem of inconsistent coding approaches by offering context-dependent sub-skills for different technologies like TypeScript, PostgreSQL, and React. Developers should use this skill whenever writing or refactoring code to ensure proper separation of pure logic from side effects, comprehensive validation at all layers, and consideration of design properties like idempotence and roundtrip behavior.
Coding Effectively
Required Sub-Skills
ALWAYS REQUIRED:
howto-functional-vs-imperative- Separate pure logic from side effectsdefense-in-depth- Validate at every layer data passes through
CONDITIONAL: Use these sub-skills when applicable:
howto-code-in-typescript- TypeScript codehowto-develop-with-postgres- PostgreSQL database codeprogramming-in-react- React frontend codewriting-good-tests- Writing or reviewing testsproperty-based-testing- Tests for serialization, validation, normalization, pure functions
Property-Driven Design
When designing features, think about properties upfront. This surfaces design gaps early.
Discovery questions:
| Question | Property Type | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Does it have an inverse operation? | Roundtrip | decode(encode(x)) == x |
| Is applying it twice the same as once? | Idempotence | f(f(x)) == f(x) |
| What quantities are preserved? | Invariants | Length, sum, count unchanged |
| Is order of arguments irrelevant? | Commutativity | f(a, b) == f(b, a) |
| Can operations be regrouped? | Associativity | f(f(a,b), c) == f(a, f(b,c)) |
| Is there a neutral element? | Identity | f(x, 0) == x |
| Is there a reference implementation? | Oracle | new(x) == old(x) |
| Can output be easily verified? | Easy to verify | is_sorted(sort(x)) |
Common design questions these reveal:
- "What about deleted/deactivated entities?"
- "Case-sensitive or not?"
- "Stable sort or not? Tie-breaking rules?"
- "Which algorithm? Configurable?"
Surface these during design, not during debugging.
Core Engineering Principles
Correctness Over Convenience
Model the full error space. No shortcuts.
- Handle all edge cases: race conditions, timing issues, partial failures
- Use the type system to encode correctness constraints
- Prefer compile-time guarantees over runtime checks where possible
- When uncertain, explore and iterate rather than assume
Don't:
- Simplify error handling to save time
- Ignore edge cases because "they probably won't happen"
- Use
anyor equivalent to bypass type checking
Error Handling Philosophy
Two-tier model:
- User-facing errors: Semantic exit codes, rich diagnostics, actionable messages
- Internal errors: Programming errors that may panic or use internal types
Error message format: Lowercase sentence fragments for "failed to {message}".
Good: failed to connect to database: connection refused
Bad: Failed to Connect to Database: Connection Refused
Good: invalid configuration: missing required field 'apiKey'
Bad: Invalid Configuration: Missing Required Field 'apiKey'Lowercase fragments compose naturally: "operation failed: " + error.message reads correctly.
Pragmatic Incrementalism
- Prefer specific, composable logic over abstract frameworks
- Evolve design incrementally rather than perfect upfront architecture
- Don't build for hypothetical future requirements
- Document design decisions and trade-offs when making non-obvious choices
The rule of three applies to abstraction: Don't abstract until you've seen the pattern three times. Three similar lines of code is better than a premature abstraction.
File Organization
Descriptive File Names Over Catch-All Files
Name files by what they contain, not by generic categories.
Don't create:
utils.ts- Becomes a dumping ground for unrelated functionshelpers.ts- Same problemcommon.ts- What isn't common?misc.ts- Actively unhelpful
Do create:
string-formatting.ts- String manipulation utilitiesdate-arithmetic.ts- Date calculationsapi-error-handling.ts- API error utilitiesuser-validation.ts- User input validation
Why this matters:
- Discoverability: Developers find code by scanning file names
- Cohesion: Related code stays together
- Prevents bloat: Hard to add unrelated code to
string-formatting.ts - Import clarity:
import { formatDate } from './date-arithmetic'is self-documenting
When you're tempted to create utils.ts: Stop. Ask what the functions have in common. Name the file after that commonality.
Module Organization
- Keep module boundaries strict with restricted visibility
- Platform-specific code in separate files:
unix.ts,windows.ts,posix.ts - Use conditional compilation or runtime checks for platform branching
- Test helpers in dedicated modules/files, not mixed with production code
Cross-Platform Principles
Use OS-Native Logic
Don't emulate Unix on Windows or vice versa. Use each platform's native patterns.
Bad: Trying to make Windows paths behave like Unix paths everywhere.
Good: Accept platform differences, handle them explicitly.
// Platform-specific behavior
if (process.platform === 'win32') {
// Windows-native approach
} else {
// POSIX approach
}Platform-Specific Files
When platform differences are significant, use separate files:
process-spawn.ts // Shared interface and logic
process-spawn-unix.ts // Unix-specific implementation
process-spawn-windows.ts // Windows-specific implementationDocument Platform Differences
When behavior differs by platform, document it in comments:
// On Windows, this returns CRLF line endings.
// On Unix, this returns LF line endings.
// Callers should normalize if consistent output is needed.
function readTextFile(path: string): string { ... }Test on All Target Platforms
Don't assume Unix behavior works on Windows. Test explicitly:
- CI should run on all supported platforms
- Platform-specific code paths need platform-specific tests
- Document which platforms are supported
Common Mistakes
| Mistake | Reality | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| "Just put it in utils for now" | utils.ts becomes 2000 lines of unrelated code | Name files by purpose from the start |
| "Edge cases are rare" | Edge cases cause production incidents | Handle them. Model the full error space. |
| "We might need this abstraction later" | Premature abstraction is harder to remove than add | Wait for the third use case |
| "It works on my Mac" | It may not work on Windows or Linux | Test on target platforms |
| "The type system is too strict" | Strictness catches bugs at compile time | Fix the type error, don't bypass it |
Red Flags
Stop and refactor when you see:
- A
utils.tsorhelpers.tsfile growing beyond 200 lines - Error handling that swallows errors or uses generic messages
- Platform-specific code mixed with cross-platform code
- Abstractions created for single use cases
- Type assertions (
as any) to bypass the type system - Code that "works on my machine" but isn't tested cross-platform