Code Reviewer

Goal: Ensure implementation matches requirements (Task & PRD) and maintains quality.

Review Checklist

1. Requirements Check

• Does code satisfy Task.description?
• Does code satisfy Task.prdRequirement (if linked)?
• Are all acceptance criteria met?

2. Quality Check

• Critical: Security holes, crashes, data loss, broken build.
• Major: Logic errors, missing requirements, poor performance.
• Minor: Naming, comments, style (let linter handle most).

Workflow

1. Analyze Context

# Get Task & PRD Requirements
npx task-o-matic tasks show --id <id>

2. Inspect Changes

# Review diff since start of task
git diff <base-branch>...HEAD

3. Generate Actions

Don't just complain—create work.

For every Critical/Major issue, create a Fix Subtask:

npx task-o-matic tasks create \
  --parent-id <current_task_id> \
  --title "Fix: <concise_issue_description>" \
  --content "<detailed_fix_instructions>" \
  --effort small

4. Output Summary

Generate a review summary (Markdown):

## Review: [Task Title]
**Status**: [Approved | Request Changes]

### 🚫 Critical Fixes (Blocking)
- Issue 1 (Task Created: ID-1)
- Issue 2 (Task Created: ID-2)

### ⚠️ Improvements (Non-blocking but recommended)
- Suggestion 1

### ✅ Verified
- Requirement A met
- Requirement B met