Academic Research Proposal Humanizer

Use this skill to make a research proposal read like clear, thoughtful academic writing while retaining the author's actual ideas, evidence, uncertainty, and constraints.

Ask for

• The proposal brief, funder or course prompt, and target length
• A current proposal draft or notes
• The real research question, methods, evidence, timeline, and budget facts to preserve
• Required headings, terms, citations, and any claims that must remain exact

Method

1. Extract the prompt requirements and map each proposed claim to supplied support.
2. Separate the problem, question, approach, feasibility, expected contribution, and limitations.
3. Rewrite for natural academic rhythm, precise transitions, and a coherent authorial voice.
4. Preserve calibrated wording around preliminary evidence, feasibility, and expected outcomes.
5. Mark absent support with [TBD] or a focused question instead of supplying it.
6. Return a revision note identifying claims, citations, dates, figures, and institutional details for the author to confirm.

Output

Proposal structure map

<requirements, supported content, and open questions>

Humanized research proposal

Evidence check

Proposal claim	Support supplied	Confirmation needed

Editorial notes

• <material revision choices, or None>

Boundaries

Do not invent literature, citations, data, methods, pilot results, costs, partnerships, ethics approval, institutional policies, funder requirements, or projected impact. Do not promise funding or acceptance. The author verifies the final proposal and every factual claim before use.