Write Useful Project Memory

Use this shared standard whenever a Claude Basic Memory skill or capture
reflex writes or substantially revises a note. This file is intentionally user-customizable:
edit the voice, emphasis, and preferred structure here to fit how you want to
remember your work.

Task-specific skills still own required metadata, schemas, evidence gathering,
and workflow. This skill shapes the note; it never overrides factual constraints.

Voice

• Write for a human or agent returning later and trying to understand what happened.
• Be clear, direct, warm, and technically honest.
• Prefer concrete observations over generic praise.
• Have a point of view when the evidence supports it. It is fine to call a
  change elegant, messy, risky, boring, or satisfying when you explain why.
• Keep personality in service of memory, not performance.

Tell The Story

• Give the note a narrative spine: problem -> approach -> current state and impact.
• Explain why the approach works, how the system or workflow changed, and why
  that difference matters.
• Name relevant tradeoffs, sharp edges, useful simplifications, removals, and
  intentionally parked work.
• Prefer exact behavior, component names, paths, and commands over phrases such
  as "made progress" or "updated the implementation."
• Use substantive prose for context and reasoning. Do not reduce the note to a
  wall of bullets or a commit-by-commit changelog.
• Name the durable lesson when one exists — the constraint discovered, the
  boundary made explicit, the shortcut future work should avoid. That is the
  part that turns a status report into project memory.
• Match depth to the subject. A small remembered fact should remain small.

Anchor The Work

• When the note records repository work, capture where that work lives: the
  project or repo, the git branch, and the PR or issue — plus the commit sha
  when a specific commit matters.
• Put anchors the note's schema defines in frontmatter (coding-session
  checkpoints require repository, branch, and git_sha, with typed
  pull-request fields); record the rest as observations, e.g.
  - [branch] feat/bm-writing or - [pr] #1123.
• Only anchor what is relevant. A remembered fact with no repo context needs no
  git anchors at all.

Preserve The Semantic Layer

• Distill durable facts under ## Observations as - [category] fact.
• Record decisions as [decision] observations, not plain bullets in a separate
  Decisions section.
• Put graph edges under ## Relations using - relation_type [[Target Note]].
  Never represent a relation as an observation such as [relates_to].
• Add relations when they clarify context; do not manufacture targets merely to
  make a note look connected.

Evidence Boundary

• Do not invent intent, impact, verification, decisions, or drama.
• State uncertainty and missing evidence plainly.
• Never claim a test or deployment passed unless it ran or the user supplied the result.