agenticnotetaking

refactor

Plan vault restructuring from config changes. Compares config.yaml against derivation.md, identifies dimension shifts, shows restructuring plan, executes on approval. Triggers on "/refactor", "restructure vault".

agenticnotetaking 3,385 218 Updated 3mo ago

Resources

1
GitHub

Install

npx skillscat add agenticnotetaking/arscontexta/refactor

Install via the SkillsCat registry.

SKILL.md

Runtime Configuration (Step 0 — before any processing)

Read these files to configure domain-specific behavior:

  1. ops/derivation-manifest.md — vocabulary mapping, dimension positions, platform hints

    • Use vocabulary.notes for the notes folder name
    • Use vocabulary.note / vocabulary.note_plural for note type references
    • Use vocabulary.topic_map / vocabulary.topic_map_plural for MOC references
    • Use vocabulary.inbox for the inbox folder name
  2. ops/config.yaml — current live configuration (the "after" state)

  3. ops/derivation.md — original derivation record (the "before" state)

If these files don't exist, report error: "Cannot refactor without both ops/config.yaml and ops/derivation.md. These files establish the baseline and current configuration."


EXECUTE NOW

INVARIANT: /refactor never executes without approval. The plan is always shown first.

Target: $ARGUMENTS

Parse immediately:

  • If target is empty: detect ALL config changes and plan restructuring
  • If target names a specific dimension (e.g., "granularity", "organization"): focus on that dimension only
  • If target is --dry-run: show plan without asking for approval

Execute these phases:

  1. Detect changes between config.yaml and derivation.md
  2. Plan restructuring for each changed dimension
  3. Show the plan with affected artifacts and risk assessment
  4. Execute on approval (unless --dry-run)
  5. Validate post-restructuring

START NOW. Reference below defines the workflow.


Philosophy

Configuration changes cascade.

Changing a dimension is not just editing a value in config.yaml. Each dimension affects multiple artifacts — skills, templates, context file sections, hooks, MOC structure. Changing organization from "flat" to "hierarchical" means restructuring the notes directory, updating MOC templates, adjusting navigation references in the context file, and regenerating skills that reference folder structure.

/refactor makes these cascades visible and manages them. Without it, dimension changes create drift: config says one thing, artifacts say another. With it, every change is planned, approved, and validated.

The relationship to /architect: /architect RECOMMENDS changes. /refactor IMPLEMENTS them. /architect analyzes health and friction to propose dimension shifts. When those proposals are approved, /refactor ensures every affected artifact is updated consistently.


Phase 1: Detect Changes

Compare each dimension in ops/config.yaml against the same dimension in ops/derivation.md:

Step 1: Read both files

Read ops/config.yaml and ops/derivation.md fully. Extract the position for each of the 8 dimensions from both.

Step 2: Build comparison table

Dimension Derivation Value Config Value Changed? Drift Type
granularity [val] [val] [yes/no] [aligned/misaligned]
organization [val] [val] [yes/no] [aligned/misaligned]
linking [val] [val] [yes/no] [aligned/misaligned]
processing [val] [val] [yes/no] [aligned/misaligned]
navigation [val] [val] [yes/no] [aligned/misaligned]
maintenance [val] [val] [yes/no] [aligned/misaligned]
schema [val] [val] [yes/no] [aligned/misaligned]
automation [val] [val] [yes/no] [aligned/misaligned]

Step 3: Check feature flags

Also compare feature flags between derivation and config:

Feature Derivation Config Changed?
semantic_search [on/off] [on/off] [yes/no]
processing_pipeline [on/off] [on/off] [yes/no]
self_space [on/off] [on/off] [yes/no]
session_capture [on/off] [on/off] [yes/no]
parallel_workers [on/off] [on/off] [yes/no]

Step 4: Early exit if no changes

If no changes detected:

--=={ refactor }==--

  No configuration drift detected between config.yaml and derivation.md.
  All dimensions and features match the original derivation.

  If you want to explore changes, run /architect for recommendations
  or edit ops/config.yaml directly, then run /refactor again.

Phase 2: Plan Restructuring

For each changed dimension, determine ALL affected artifacts. This is the cascade analysis.

Dimension-to-Artifact Mapping

Change Affected Artifacts What Changes
Granularity shift Note templates, extraction depth in /reduce, processing skills, context file "Note Design" section Template body length guidance, extraction granularity settings, composability test thresholds
Organization shift Folder structure, MOC hierarchy, context file "Folder Architecture" section, hub MOC Directory layout, MOC tier count, navigation references
Linking shift Semantic search config, /reflect connection density expectations, context file "Connection Finding" section Search tool availability, link threshold values, discovery layer instructions
Processing shift /reduce depth settings, /reflect pass count, pipeline skills, context file "Processing Pipeline" section, config.yaml processing.depth Extraction thoroughness, connection evaluation depth, chaining mode
Navigation shift MOC tier structure, hub MOC, context file "MOC" section, note Topics footers Number of MOC tiers, hub content, navigation instructions
Maintenance shift /health threshold values, condition-based trigger settings, context file maintenance instructions Check frequency conditions, stale note thresholds, reweave trigger conditions
Schema shift Templates (_schema blocks), validation rules, /validate skill, query scripts, context file "YAML" section Required fields, enum values, validation patterns
Automation shift Hooks (session orient, write validation, inbox processing), skill activation, config.yaml automation section Which hooks are active, automation level references

Artifact Analysis Format

For each affected artifact, specify:

Artifact: [file path]
  Section: [specific section within the file, if applicable]
  Current: [what it says now — quote relevant content]
  Proposed: [what it should say after refactoring]
  Risk: [low | medium | high]
  Reversible: [yes | no — with explanation]
  Content impact: [does this affect existing notes? how many?]

Content Impact Assessment

Some changes affect only infrastructure (skills, templates, context file). Others affect existing content (notes, MOCs):

Change Type Content Impact Action Required
Template field addition New notes get field, old notes don't Add field to old notes (schema migration)
Template field removal Old notes have unused field Remove field from old notes (optional)
Folder restructure Notes must move Move files, update all wiki links
MOC tier change MOC hierarchy restructured Merge/split MOCs, update Topics footers
Enum value change Old notes have invalid values Update values in affected notes

For content-impacting changes:

  • Count affected notes: grep -rl '[old value]' {vocabulary.notes}/*.md | wc -l
  • List specific files that need updating
  • Estimate time for content migration

Interaction Constraint Check

Read ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/reference/interaction-constraints.md and check:

  1. Hard blocks: Would the new configuration create a combination that WILL fail?

    • Example: atomic granularity + 2-tier navigation at high volume
    • If a hard block is detected: WARN the user and recommend against the change
  2. Soft warns: What friction points does the new configuration create?

    • Example: dense schema + convention-level automation (manual schema enforcement is tedious)
    • If soft warns exist: note them in the plan with compensating mechanisms
  3. Cascade effects: Does changing dimension X create pressure on dimension Y?

    • If cascade detected: include Y in the restructuring plan even if Y did not change in config

Phase 3: Show Plan

Present the complete restructuring plan:

--=={ refactor }==--

Detected [N] dimension changes:

  [dimension]: [old] -> [new]
    Affects:
    - [artifact 1]: [specific change]
    - [artifact 2]: [specific change]
    Content impact: [N] existing {vocabulary.note_plural} need [what]
    Risk: [low/medium/high]

  [dimension]: [old] -> [new]
    Affects:
    - [artifact 1]: [specific change]
    - [artifact 2]: [specific change]
    Content impact: none
    Risk: [low/medium/high]

Interaction constraints:
  - [Hard block | Soft warn | Clean]: [description]

Unchanged (preserved as-is):
  - [list artifacts not affected by changes]

Estimated implementation time: ~[N] minutes
Validation: Will run kernel validation after restructuring.

If --dry-run: Stop here. Do not ask for approval.

Otherwise: Ask: "Proceed with restructuring? (yes / no / adjust)"

Handle responses:

Response Action
"yes" Execute Phase 4
"no" Exit without changes
"adjust" Ask what to change, revise plan, re-present

Phase 4: Execute on Approval

Execute changes in strict order to prevent intermediate inconsistency:

4a. Archive Current State

Before making changes, record the current state for rollback reference:

# Log what is about to change
DATE=$(date -u +"%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ")
echo "## $DATE: /refactor — [dimensions changed]" >> ops/changelog.md
echo "" >> ops/changelog.md
echo "Changes planned:" >> ops/changelog.md
echo "[list of changes]" >> ops/changelog.md

4b. Regenerate Affected Skills

For each skill affected by the dimension changes:

  1. Read the current skill from the generated skills directory
  2. Consult ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/reference/ for the latest skill generation approach
  3. Apply vocabulary transformation from derivation-manifest
  4. Apply processing depth settings from the new config
  5. Write the regenerated skill

Skills most commonly affected by dimension changes:

Dimension Change Skills to Regenerate
Granularity /reduce, /verify, /validate
Processing /reduce, /reflect, /reweave, /verify, /ralph, /pipeline
Linking /reflect, /reweave
Navigation /reflect (MOC update logic)
Schema /validate, /verify
Automation /ralph, /pipeline (chaining mode)
Maintenance /health

4c. Update Context File

Edit only the sections affected by changed dimensions. Do NOT rewrite the entire context file.

For each affected section:

  1. Locate the section by heading
  2. Read current content
  3. Generate updated content reflecting new dimension positions
  4. Replace the section using Edit tool
  5. Verify surrounding sections are unchanged

4d. Update Templates

For schema changes:

  1. Read affected templates from ops/templates/ (or templates/)
  2. Update _schema blocks with new required fields, enum values, constraints
  3. Write updated templates

4e. Update Hooks

If automation level changed:

  1. Read current hooks from the hooks directory
  2. Update trigger conditions, threshold values, or active/inactive state
  3. Write updated hooks

4f. Update Derivation Records

After all changes are applied:

  1. Update ops/derivation.md with:

    • New dimension positions
    • Rationale for each change
    • Date of change
    • Reference to /architect recommendation (if applicable)
  2. Update ops/derivation-manifest.md to sync machine-readable config

  3. Update ops/config.yaml to confirm it matches derivation (should already match since config triggered the refactor)

4g. Content Migration (if needed)

If Phase 2 identified content-impacting changes:

  1. Schema migration: Add/remove/rename fields across notes

    # Example: add a new required field to all notes
    for f in {vocabulary.notes}/*.md; do
      grep -q '^new_field:' "$f" || sed -i '' '/^description:/a\
    new_field: [default value]' "$f"
    done
  2. Folder migration: Move files to new locations

    # Use git mv to preserve history
    git mv "old/path/file.md" "new/path/file.md"
  3. Link updates: Update all wiki links affected by renames

    # Use rename script if available
    ops/scripts/rename-note.sh "old name" "new name"
  4. MOC restructuring: Merge/split MOCs as needed

    • For splits: create sub-MOCs, move Core Ideas, update parent
    • For merges: combine Core Ideas, remove redundant MOC, update notes' Topics footers

Phase 5: Validate

Run kernel validation to confirm nothing broke:

Validation Checks

Check How Pass Criterion
Wiki link resolution Scan for all [[X]] and verify X.md exists Zero dangling links
Schema compliance Check all notes against template _schema blocks All required fields present, enum values valid
MOC hierarchy Verify hub links to domain MOCs, domains link to topics All tiers connected
Session orient Simulate session start — can the context file be loaded? No file-not-found errors
Three-space boundaries Check notes vs ops vs self boundaries No content in wrong space
Vocabulary consistency Check that skills and context file use updated vocabulary No stale universal terms
Skill integrity Verify regenerated skills have valid frontmatter and structure All skills parseable

Validation Report

--=={ refactor complete }==--

  Restructuring applied:
    [dimension]: [old] -> [new] — [N] artifacts updated
    [dimension]: [old] -> [new] — [N] artifacts updated

  Content migration:
    [N] {vocabulary.note_plural} updated with new schema fields
    [N] wiki links updated
    [N] {vocabulary.topic_map_plural} restructured

  Kernel validation: [N]/[N] checks PASS
  [Any warnings or issues]

  Derivation updated: ops/derivation.md
  Changelog updated: ops/changelog.md

If any validation checks fail:

  WARNING: [N] validation checks failed:
    - [check name]: [specific failure]

  Recommended action: [specific fix]
  Rollback guidance: [how to revert if needed]

Edge Cases

No ops/config.yaml or No ops/derivation.md

Cannot refactor without both files. Report error and suggest creating them:

Cannot run /refactor: [missing file] not found.
  - ops/config.yaml is the live configuration
  - ops/derivation.md is the original design baseline
  Both are required to detect dimension shifts.

  Run /setup to create a new system, or manually create the missing file.

Single Dimension Focus

If $ARGUMENTS names a specific dimension:

  1. Only check that dimension for changes
  2. Still check interaction constraints (other dimensions may be affected by cascade)
  3. Only restructure artifacts affected by that dimension

No Changes Detected

Report clean state and exit (see Phase 1 early exit).

Hard Block Detected

If an interaction constraint hard block is detected:

  HARD BLOCK: The proposed configuration [dimension X = val, dimension Y = val]
  creates a combination that will fail because [reason from interaction-constraints.md].

  Recommended: Either change [dimension X] back to [safe value] or also change
  [dimension Y] to [compensating value].

  Cannot proceed with current configuration. Adjust and re-run /refactor.

Do NOT proceed with restructuring when a hard block is active.

Large Content Migration (100+ notes)

For large migrations:

  1. Show the count and estimated time
  2. Offer batch processing: "This affects 150 notes. Process all at once or in batches of 50?"
  3. For batch processing, validate after each batch before continuing

Feature Flag Changes

Feature flag changes (semantic_search, self_space, etc.) may require:

  • Creating new directories (self/ for self_space on)
  • Installing tools (qmd for semantic_search on)
  • Removing hooks (for automation off)

Handle each feature flag change specifically:

Flag On -> Off Off -> On
semantic_search Remove search references from skills, update context file Add search config, update skills with search integration
self_space Archive self/ contents, remove self/ references Create self/ structure, generate identity files
session_capture INVARIANT — cannot disable Already on (invariant)
parallel_workers Update /ralph to serial-only mode Verify tmux available, update /ralph for parallel mode

No ops/derivation-manifest.md

Use universal vocabulary. Refactoring still works but vocabulary transformation is skipped.