Code Review

Automated code review and analysis

Showing 961-984 of 11146 skills
dotnet

writing-mstest-tests

by dotnet

Fix, modernize, review, or explain supplied MSTest code and MSTest-specific configuration while honoring installed versions and project style. ALWAYS USE for direct corrections: expected/actual order; generic/manual assertions; exception, hard-cast, or object[] patterns; TestContext/lifecycle; timeout/cancellation; condition/retry/cleanup; parallelization; MSTest.Sdk setup; or MSTESTxxxx. Use for "review" only when corrected code or edits are wanted. DO NOT USE for new test-case design (code-testing-agent), report-only audits/metrics (test-anti-patterns or assertion-quality), creating/wiring a first test project (scaffold-dotnet-test-project), running tests, migration, non-MSTest frameworks, or non-.NET.

Code Review 5.7K 2mo ago
dotnet

test-smell-detection

by dotnet

Audits existing tests in any language using formal, research-backed test smell names and the testsmells.org 19-smell academic taxonomy. Use when the caller asks for an academic or citable test-smell review, named smell categories, or a formal severity-ranked smell assessment. Covers Assertion Roulette, Conditional Test Logic, Mystery Guest, Eager Test, Sleepy Test, Unknown Test, Sensitive Equality, and the rest of the catalog across .NET, Python, JavaScript/TypeScript, Java, Go, Ruby, Rust, Swift, Kotlin, PowerShell, and C++. DO NOT USE FOR a quick pragmatic test review (use test-anti-patterns), writing or running tests, framework migration, coverage, or assertion-diversity metrics.

Code Review 5.7K 2mo ago
dotnet

exp-mock-usage-analysis

by dotnet

"Audits .NET test mock usage by tracing each mock setup through the production code's execution path to find dead, unreachable, redundant, or replaceable mocks. Use when the user asks to audit mock usage, find unused or unnecessary mock setups, check if mocks are needed, reduce mock duplication or over-mocking, simplify test setup, or review whether mock configurations like ILogger/IOptions should use real implementations instead. Supports Moq, NSubstitute, and FakeItEasy."

Code Review 5.7K 6mo ago
dotnet

authoring-github-workflows

by dotnet

"Author and review GitHub Actions workflow YAML safely so syntactically-valid YAML can't ship a workflow that GitHub Actions refuses to run. USE FOR: editing, adding, or reviewing any file under .github/workflows/, writing run-name/name/if/env/run values that contain ${{ }} expressions, diagnosing a run that fails with 'This run likely failed because of a workflow file issue' and no jobs starting, deciding when a workflow scalar must be quoted, validating workflows with actionlint. DO NOT USE FOR: authoring application YAML unrelated to GitHub Actions, Azure Pipelines, GitLab CI, or non-workflow YAML. SCOPE: this skill covers syntactic/structural correctness of workflow YAML (quoting, parsing, actionlint); for semantic and functional workflow design (what a workflow should do, agentic-workflow behavior), see .github/agents/agentic-workflows.agent.md — the two are complementary. INVOKES: actionlint (downloaded pinned binary) plus git/grep for inspection."

Code Review 5.7K 4mo ago
dotnet

detect-static-dependencies

by dotnet

Scan C# source files for hard-to-test static dependencies — DateTime.Now/UtcNow, File., Directory., Environment., HttpClient, Console., Process.*, and other untestable statics. Produces a ranked report of static call sites by frequency. USE FOR: find untestable statics, scan for static dependencies, testability audit, identify hard-to-mock code, find DateTime.Now usage, detect static coupling, testability report, static analysis for testability. DO NOT USE FOR: generating wrappers (use generate-testability-wrappers), migrating code (use migrate-static-to-wrapper), general code review, or finding statics that are already behind abstractions.

Code Review 5.7K 2mo ago
dotnet

convert-to-cpm

by dotnet

Convert .NET projects and solutions (.sln, .slnx) to NuGet Central Package Management (CPM) using Directory.Packages.props. USE FOR: converting to CPM, centralizing or aligning NuGet package versions across multiple projects, inlining MSBuild version properties from Directory.Build.props into Directory.Packages.props, resolving version conflicts or mismatches across a solution or repository, updating or bumping or syncing package versions across projects. Also activate when packages are out of sync, drifting, or inconsistent -- even without the user mentioning CPM. Provides baseline build capture, version conflict resolution, build validation with binlog comparison, and a structured post-conversion report. DO NOT USE FOR: packages.config projects (must migrate to PackageReference first) or repositories that already have CPM fully enabled.

Code Review 5.7K 2mo ago
dotnet

test-tagging

by dotnet

"Analyzes test suites in any language and tags each test with standardized traits (positive, negative, critical-path, boundary, smoke, regression, integration, performance, security). Use when the user wants to categorize, audit, or label tests with traits. Works across .NET (MSTest/xUnit/NUnit/TUnit), Python (pytest), TS/JS (Jest/Vitest), Java, Go, Ruby, Rust, Swift, Kotlin, PowerShell, and C++ — auto-editing when the framework has canonical tag syntax, otherwise report-only. Do not use for writing new tests, running tests, or migrating frameworks."

Code Review 5.7K 4mo ago
dotnet

eval-performance

by dotnet

"Guide for diagnosing and improving MSBuild project evaluation performance. USE FOR: builds slow before any compilation starts, high evaluation time in binlog analysis, expensive glob patterns walking large directories (node_modules, .git, bin/obj), deep import chains (>20 levels), preprocessed output >10K lines indicating heavy evaluation, property functions with file I/O ($([System.IO.File]::ReadAllText(...))), multiple evaluations per project. Covers the 5 MSBuild evaluation phases, glob optimization via DefaultItemExcludes, import chain analysis with /pp preprocessing. DO NOT USE FOR: compilation-time slowness (use build-perf-diagnostics), incremental build issues (use incremental-build), non-MSBuild build systems."

Code Review 5.7K 3mo ago
dotnet

assertion-quality

by dotnet

"Produce an assertion-quality report or metrics for existing tests. ALWAYS USE when asked whether assertions are weak, shallow, trivial, always true, self-referential, or diverse; which tests are assertion-free or use only presence/truthiness checks; or for depth/variety metrics. Polyglot. DO NOT USE for direct fixes: use writing-mstest-tests for supplied MSTest assertions, or code-testing-agent when new cases must be designed. Do not use for mutation reasoning (test-gap-analysis) or a general severity-ranked audit (test-anti-patterns)."

Code Review 5.7K 2mo ago
dotnet

property-patterns

by dotnet

"MSBuild property definition patterns: conditional defaults, composition/concatenation, path normalization, trailing-slash handling, TFM detection helpers, and evaluation order. USE FOR: diagnosing and fixing property definition issues and shared-property anti-patterns in .props/.csproj; DefineConstants or NoWarn overwritten instead of appended; unconditional assignments that block project-level overrides; unquoted conditions that fail on empty properties; hardcoded paths that break cross-platform builds; setting overridable defaults; property evaluation order and last-write-wins semantics. DO NOT USE FOR: props vs targets placement (use directory-build-organization), item operations (use item-management), target structure (use target-authoring), general anti-patterns (use msbuild-antipatterns), non-MSBuild build systems."

Code Review 5.7K 3mo ago
Besty0728

unity-test

by Besty0728

"Unity Test Runner operations. Use when users want to run, list, or check test results. Triggers: test, unit test, test runner, EditMode, PlayMode, Unity测试, Unity单元测试, Unity测试运行."

Code Review 1.9K 8mo ago
Besty0728

unity-event

by Besty0728

"UnityEvent management. Use when users want to inspect or modify UI events like Button.onClick. Triggers: event, onClick, listener, callback, UnityEvent, button click, 事件, 监听器, 按钮点击."

Code Review 1.9K 8mo ago
Besty0728

unity-validation

by Besty0728

"Project validation and cleanup. Use when users want to find missing scripts, validate references, or check project health. Triggers: validate, missing script, broken reference, check, health, Unity验证, 丢失脚本, 引用检测."

Code Review 1.9K 8mo ago
Besty0728

unity-physics

by Besty0728

"Unity physics operations. Use when users want to perform raycasts, overlap checks, or configure gravity. Triggers: physics, raycast, overlap, gravity, collision, layer mask, 物理, 射线检测, 重力, 碰撞."

Code Review 1.9K 8mo ago
lyndonkl

cognitive-fallacies-guard

by lyndonkl

Use when detecting and preventing visual misleads, cognitive biases, and design failures in data visualizations, dashboards, reports, or presentations. Invoke when user mentions chartjunk, misleading chart, truncated axis, data integrity, visual deception, 3D chart problems, cherry-picking data, or needs to audit visualizations for honesty and accuracy.

Code Review 186 8mo ago
alirezarezvani

senior-security

by alirezarezvani

Security engineering toolkit for threat modeling, vulnerability analysis, secure architecture, and penetration testing. Includes STRIDE analysis, OWASP guidance, cryptography patterns, and security scanning tools.

Auth 28.7K 8mo ago
alirezarezvani

adversarial-reviewer

by alirezarezvani

"Adversarial code review that breaks the self-review monoculture. Use when you want a genuinely critical review of recent changes, before merging a PR, or when you suspect Claude is being too agreeable about code quality. Forces perspective shifts through hostile reviewer personas that catch blind spots the author's mental model shares with the reviewer."

Code Review 28.7K 6mo ago
alirezarezvani

executive-mentor

by alirezarezvani

"Adversarial thinking partner for founders and executives. Stress-tests plans, prepares for brutal board meetings, dissects decisions with no good options, and forces honest post-mortems. Use when you need someone to find the holes before the board does, make a decision you've been avoiding, or understand what actually went wrong."

Code Review 28.7K 7mo ago
alirezarezvani

chief-of-staff

by alirezarezvani

"C-suite orchestration layer. Routes founder questions to the right advisor role(s), triggers multi-role board meetings for complex decisions, synthesizes outputs, and tracks decisions. Every C-suite interaction starts here. Loads company context automatically."

Agents 28.7K 7mo ago
nyldn

skill-iterative-loop

by nyldn

Execute tasks in loops with conditions until goals are met. Use when: AUTOMATICALLY ACTIVATE when user requests iterative execution:. "loop X times" or "loop around N times". "loop around 5 times auditing, enhancing, testing"

Code Review 4.3K 7mo ago
ghostsecurity

ghost-validate

by ghostsecurity

This skill should be used when the user asks to "validate a finding", "check if a vulnerability is real", "triage a security finding", "confirm a vulnerability", "determine if a finding is a true positive or false positive", or provides a security finding for review. It validates security vulnerability findings by tracing data flows, verifying exploit conditions, analyzing security controls, and optionally testing attack vectors against a live application.

Code Review 423 8mo ago
lyndonkl

memory-retrieval-learning

by lyndonkl

Use when long-term knowledge retention is needed (weeks to months), studying for exams or certifications, learning new job skills or technology, mastering substantial material that requires systematic review, combating forgetting through spaced repetition and retrieval practice, or when user mentions studying, memorizing, learning plans, spaced repetition, flashcards, active recall, or durable learning.

Code Gen 186 11mo ago
comet-ml

explore-feature

by comet-ml

Use when a developer wants a release-gate test for a change before merge — e.g. "explore this feature", "add a release-gate test for my PR", "gate this branch", "cover the feature in PR #7303", "release-gate test for these tickets". Reads a ticket + changed code, writes a happy-path test-plan.md (posted to Jira), and commits one staging-ready @release-gate Playwright test that gates that change's own release. Delegates the actual test authoring to writing-e2e-tests.

Code Review 22.9K 2mo ago
BlackBeltTechnology

doubt-driven-review

by BlackBeltTechnology

'In-flight adversarial check on a non-trivial decision BEFORE it stands — distinct from post-hoc review of a finished diff. Use on "stress-test this decision", "are we sure about this", "verify before commit", "poke holes in this", when working in unfamiliar code, or before an irreversible step (migration, prod deploy, public API). Runs earlier than code-review, while course-correction is cheap.'

Code Review 331 25d ago