- Home
- /
- Categories
- /
- Code Review
Code Review
Automated code review and analysis
playwright-validation
by open-metadata
Use when validating UI changes in a branch require Playwright E2E testing. Reviews branch changes, validates UI with Playwright MCP, and adds missing test cases.
openmetadata-workflow
by open-metadata
Meta-skill loaded at session start. Directs Claude to check for applicable OpenMetadata skills before starting any task. Ensures structured workflows are followed.
connector-audit
by open-metadata
Deep reliability audit for OpenMetadata connectors — runs 7 investigation prompts (metadata, errors, auth, lineage, scale, synthesis, implementation) against connector standards
connector-review
by open-metadata
Review an OpenMetadata connector against golden standards. Runs multi-agent analysis covering architecture, code quality, type safety, testing, and performance. When a PR number is given, automatically posts the quality summary to the PR description and a detailed review as a PR comment.
agent-prompt-quality-bar
by mastra-ai
Universal quality bar and final audit rubric for any agent system prompt. Activate this whenever you are unsure which archetype skill applies, or as a final review pass before writing the system prompt. It defines the required run contract, completion criteria, fallback paths, response format, and anti-patterns every produced agent prompt must satisfy.
performance-review
by mastra-ai
Performance-focused code review for identifying bottlenecks and optimization opportunities
mastra-smoke-test
by mastra-ai
Smoke test Mastra projects locally or deploy to staging/production. Tests Studio UI, agents, tools, workflows, traces, memory, and more. Supports both local development and cloud deployments.
herdr-manager-query
by mastra-ai
Query the authoritative global Herdr Review and Work Manager inventory, recommend actionable PR work, and explicitly materialize confirmed remote-only Review Manager records through the plugin's stable public CLI.
code-standards
by mastra-ai
Code quality standards and style guide for reviewing pull requests
configure-factory-rules
by mastra-ai
Configure typed Mastra Factory rules and exact-leaf overrides in deployment code
docs-audit
by mastra-ai
Autonomous, report-only documentation review for Mastra docs. Use when auditing changed docs against source, validating contextual code examples or API coverage, checking canonical mastra-docs guidance, or running narrow deterministic checks.
pr-splitter
by mastra-ai
Use when breaking a large, complex, messy, or hard-to-review pull request into multiple smaller PRs; planning stacked PRs; extracting independent changes from a branch; splitting mixed refactor and behavior changes; managing drift after review feedback; rebasing follow-up PRs as earlier PRs change; or preserving original branch intent while shipping incrementally.
herdr-kit-workflows
by mastra-ai
Set up and operate Herdr Kit safely: install and configure the plugin and Mastra Code integration, manage Review and Work repository scope, open primary repository workspaces, synchronize managers, materialize or dematerialize managed worktrees, and update Herdr Kit settings or shortcuts.
gh-bulk-issues
by mastra-ai
Orchestrate parallel Mastra Code headless instances to debug and fix multiple GitHub issues simultaneously
pr-explainer
by mastra-ai
Use when creating an approachable, self-contained HTML review aid for a pull request; explaining what changed, why it matters, how it works, and how it fits into the broader system; turning PR diffs, commits, tests, and architecture context into a local .pr-review/ HTML page for reviewers; or helping reviewers understand complex code changes without dumping the full diff.
security-review
by mastra-ai
Security-focused code review checklist for identifying vulnerabilities
coding-agent
by mastra-ai
Authoring playbook for building agents that write, edit, review, or refactor code. Use this when the user asks for an agent that writes scripts, generates code, reviews pull requests, refactors a codebase, fixes bugs, implements features, writes tests, or works with programming languages such as Python, TypeScript, JavaScript, Go, Rust, SQL, or shell.
benchmark
by garrytan
Performance regression detection using the browse daemon. (gstack)
docs-review
by cloudflare
Reviews documentation PRs and provides GitHub PR suggestions. Load when asked to review, suggest changes, or provide feedback on docs content. Covers MDX, frontmatter, style guide, components, and content accuracy.
backend-code-review
by langgenius
Use only when the user explicitly requests a review or audit of backend code under api/. Supports pending-change, file-focused, and pasted-diff reviews. Do not use for implementation-only requests, diagnosis without review intent, frontend code, or backend code outside api/.
agent-testing
by lobehub
Agentic end-to-end testing for any project: backend verification via the project CLI, frontend verification via agent-browser (web), and desktop verification via CDP (Electron). Drives the real surface, captures visually confirmed evidence, and publishes a structured report to LobeHub Acceptance. Triggers on 'cli test', 'test with cli', 'verify with cli', 'backend test with cli', 'local test', 'test in electron', 'test desktop', 'manual test', 'test report', or any local end-to-end verification task.
deep-review
by lobehub
'Multi-dimensional code review. Use when the user asks to review, evaluate, or audit a PR, diff, branch, or pasted change — including informal review asks like "look at this change for problems" — via light mode: one independent reviewer against the dimension quick checklists. Not for explain-only questions about what a change does or why. Deep mode runs only on explicit invocation (/deep-review), and normally at most once per logical requirement.'
skills-audit
by lobehub
'Audit .agents/skills SKILL.md files. Use for recurring checks of duplicate, overlapping, stale, inconsistent, or broken skills and merge/delete candidates.'
code-reviewer
by Shubhamsaboo
Thorough code review with focus on security, performance, and best practices. Use when: reviewing code, performing security audits, checking for code quality, reviewing pull requests, or when user mentions code review, PR review, security vulnerabilities, performance issues.