Acceptance (Builder Self-Evidence)

You are the builder for a delivery. A separate review step judges it against
a plan — checks you author, or a verify plan handed to this run. A check that
declares requiredEvidence cannot pass on your text alone: a missing artifact
marks it uncertain and holds the delivery.

author (or discover) the plan  →  pick the surface  →  capture evidence  →  publish the round  →  self-check coverage

Read the project layer first

Before touching an environment, check for .agents/acceptance/:

File	What it owns
PROJECT.md	Start/stop commands, ports, services, auth, surfaces, probes
PROCESS.md	The run process: approval gate, execution rules, teardown
common-mistakes.md	Project living log — what earlier rounds got wrong here
probe-mock-patterns.md	Project living log — how to force state on this product

The project layer owns how this repository is run; this skill owns what a
valid round is (plan, evidence, report, immutable round, the hard rule). On
running, the project layer wins; on what may be published, this skill wins. Never
invent a start command, port, or auth flow PROJECT.md answers; fix a divergence
in the adapter during the run instead of working around it. No
.agents/acceptance/ → bootstrap one first:
project-adapter.md.

Living logs — inject each by its own shape

Both layers (this skill's generic copies and the project's own) are loaded once
the target is known, silently:

• common-mistakes.md — read its
  Checklist in full, now and again before marking any case pass. Pull an
  entry by id only when a checklist line applies to a case.
• probe-mock-patterns.md — read the
  heading index, then pull only the entries this round needs. Pick by meaning,
  not keyword; rg over the body is the fallback.

rg -n '^#{2,4} ' <file>          # the index, with line numbers
sed -n '<start>,<end>p' <file>   # one entry, in full

Record new project-specific learnings in the project layer only.

Two paths — no id is required

Every evidence command targets a round. The authored path is the default; you
have an operation id only when the invocation names one. Never hunt the
environment for one, and never report this skill inapplicable — a round without
an operation is simply recorded as standalone.

You have	Path
No plan — you author the checks	Write result.json + assets/, publish with lh acceptance run ingest — report.md
An operation id you were given	lh verify plan state, then result submit --operation per criterion — plan-format.md

Pass --subject (task:<id> / topic:<id> / document:<id>) only when the
caller named one; otherwise ingest attaches the round itself when it can and
creates a standalone acceptance when it cannot. On the first ingest, always supply
--requirement "<one-sentence business goal>" — the durable goal of the whole
acceptance, not this round's scope; it is immutable once recorded.

Prerequisites: lh is authed (lh acceptance run list --json returns [] or
data; an auth error means stop and surface it), and only the UI driver the
selected surface needs is installed — probe before adding dependencies, and never
substitute a private agent plugin.

HARD RULE — programmatic gates are NEVER acceptance checks

Every check MUST be an outcome a person decides about the delivery: what the
user sees, hears, reads, or receives. These MUST NOT appear as a check, under any
phrasing: unit / integration / regression / snapshot tests, coverage,
type-check / tsc, lint / eslint, format, "compiles", "build passes",
"CI is green". Run them, then report them as one line of narrative.

Enforced at ingest: every matching item (matched on title, category, AND
method — "run bun run test" under a product-sounding title still matches) is
dropped with a warning and summary recounted; a round of only such checks
fails to publish. The line is the subject of the check, not who judged it:
a CLI behavior asserted by a command is a fine check (verifier: "program");
"the suite is green" is not. Before writing any plan, ask of each draft check:
would the user click accept/reject on this?

Rounds are immutable — repair means a NEW round

A published round is a permanent record. Never re-submit into a round after
changing the code — publish the re-verification as the next round and let the
acceptance page show the progression.

Before a repair round, read the aggregate with
lh acceptance view <acceptanceId | type:id> --json. Omit checks whose latest
userReview.action is accept; address non-stale rejects under their exact
stable ids; when a check semantically replaces another, declare
supersedes: ['old-id'] and repeat the full lineage in every later round that
reuses the successor id. Pass --acceptance <acceptanceId> so the round joins
the same history.

Rules you will be tempted to skip

Not judgment calls — the moves an agent under pressure makes and must not. Each
excuse below was made in a real round.

Excuse	Reality
"Injection is hard; happy-path plus unit tests covers it"	The error state was the goal. Walk the probe ladder (probe-mock-patterns.md A) before calling it blocked. (M2)
"The branch name says what to verify" / "Loading the living logs first…"	The task lives in the user's words. Recover it, or confirm a labeled guess with one structured question — silently; never narrate setup. (M3, M21)
"The black frame is probably display sleep / a permission"	Measure first: pixel brightness, the permission bit, an A/B with one variable toggled. Publish "confirmed by X" or "suspected", never a guess. (M4)
"Let me ask how they want it run" / "I'll click Sign in and you authorize" / "too small to screenshot"	Environment mechanics are yours: full isolated run, auth by direct injection (never an interactive login — it hijacks the user's browser), a screenshot for every user-facing change. Ask only about the product decision. (M8)
"One more config edit and the env will boot" / "I'll mock it" / "I'll drive the rest myself"	Timebox. Inventory running instances, probe for the real capability before mocking (a mock that records nothing is not in the path), re-delegate a dead subagent's remaining steps, revert experiments and ask. (M17)
"The fix is in and tests pass — verified"	Reproduce the failure's precondition first, then verify with it held. A run that cannot fail proves nothing; "reproduces sometimes" means an unnamed precondition. When the mocked seam is the suspect, drop the mock. (M31)

Pick the surface by what you changed

Match the change to the cheapest surface that can prove it; escalate only if
needed.

What your task changed	Surface	Guide
Backend / CLI / library / data logic	CLI — stdout as text, zero UI flakiness	surfaces/cli.md
Web app frontend / styles / interactions	Web (agent-browser → running web app)	surfaces/web.md
New/changed API plus the UI consuming it	Web, full-stack (agent-browser + network capture)	surfaces/web.md
Desktop-only behavior (native windows, IPC, packaged shell)	Electron (agent-browser --cdp)	surfaces/electron.md
Native macOS app / OS chrome agent-browser can't reach	Native (osascript + screencapture, local macOS)	surfaces/native.md
Native iOS behavior, gestures, device-size layout	iOS Simulator (AXe/native CLI + simctl)	surfaces/ios-simulator.md

• Don't open a browser for a backend change; command output as text is the
  strongest, cheapest proof. Use Electron only when the criterion depends on
  desktop-only code; iOS is driven by a Simulator HID/AX CLI, never host mouse —
  mark the case blocked if the CLI cannot express the gesture.
• Structured data uses native visualizations (cases[].datasets +
  cases[].visualizations; raw CSV/JSON stays as evidence), not a PNG —
  report.md. A deliverable
  the user hears needs audio —
  evidence.md.
• Auth is a gate scoped to the surface: authenticate that surface first or
  every capture lands on the sign-in page. Web:
  auth-web.md.
• A UI round may price its interaction cost by recording KLM operator counts
  into interaction-trace.jsonl; optional, never hand-written —
  interaction-cost.md.

Shared rules for every artifact — media types, provenance, file vs inline,
safety — are in evidence.md.

Final handoff (mandatory)

Before declaring the task done, prove coverage: for each check with
requiredEvidence, every declared type is present at least once. Report it
explicitly; a missing type holds the delivery at uncertain no matter how good
the work is.

The final response MUST include the published acceptance URL together with the
coverage result — never only a check-result id or a prose claim. Expose only the
acceptance (/acceptance/<acceptanceId>), the stable cross-round decision
surface; append ?r=<roundIndex> for this round's fixed snapshot.
Put no images, local paths, local file links, or internal run-page paths in the
chat reply.

Acceptance:   https://app.lobehub.com/acceptance/<acceptanceId>
Coverage: 2/2 criteria, all required evidence uploaded

Portability rules

• Engine-level capture over OS capture. agent-browser screenshot / dom /
  eval run headless; screencapture / osascript are macOS-only. iOS: xcrun simctl io over host-window capture. Rounds land under .acceptances/, which
  the CLI keeps out of git.
• Upload as you go. Evidence keyed to its check mid-run survives a crash near
  the end.
• Don't invent evidence. Capture only the types a check declares.

Reference map

Need	Reference
The project layer, bootstrapping an adapter	project-adapter.md
Mistakes checklist (read every round)	common-mistakes.md
Forcing state, error injection, runtime probes	probe-mock-patterns.md
Authored rounds, result.json, ingest	report.md
Plan-driven rounds: schema, submit, coverage	plan-format.md
Evidence media, provenance, submission, safety	evidence.md
Interaction cost overlay	interaction-cost.md
Web/Electron Chromium CLI commands	agent-browser.md
Authenticated Web session	auth-web.md
Native macOS / OS-owned step	computer-use.md
Temporal evidence: Web/Electron, iOS, native	recording-cdp.md, recording-ios-simulator.md, recording-native-macos.md