Team-Based ATDD Workflow

Orchestrate an agent team that follows the Acceptance Test Driven Development
workflow. The team lead coordinates specialist agents through five phases:
spec writing, spec review, pipeline generation, implementation, and
post-implementation review.

Team Detection

Before creating a team, check for existing teams:

1. Read ~/.claude/teams/ to list active teams
2. If a team exists, present the user with a choice:
   • Extend — Add ATDD roles (spec-writer, implementer, reviewer) to the
     existing team. Skip roles that already exist by name.
   • Replace — Shut down the existing team and create a fresh ATDD team.
   • New team — Create a separate ATDD team alongside the existing one.

If no team exists, proceed directly to team creation.

Roles

Create three teammates with these roles:

Name	Agent Type	Purpose
spec-writer	general-purpose	Writes Given/When/Then acceptance specs in domain language. Follows the atdd skill strictly.
implementer	general-purpose	Implements features using TDD. Unit tests first, then code, until both test streams pass.
reviewer	general-purpose	Reviews specs for implementation leakage. Reviews code for quality. Has the atdd plugin installed. Runs /atdd:spec-check.

The team lead (the orchestrating agent or user) owns the workflow, reviews
specs, approves all work, and enforces discipline. The team lead never delegates
approval — specs are the team lead's contract.

Workflow Phases

Execute phases strictly in order. Each phase has a gate that must pass before
proceeding to the next phase.

Phase 1 — Spec Writing

Assign to: spec-writer

Send the feature description and instruct the spec-writer to:

1. Read the existing codebase to understand domain language
2. Write Given/When/Then specs in specs/[feature-name].txt
3. Use ONLY external observables — no implementation language
4. Follow the GWT format from the atdd skill (semicolon comments,
   periods at end of statements)
5. Send specs back for review before proceeding

Gate: Team lead reviews and approves specs. Do not proceed until approved.

For the detailed prompt template, see references/prompts.md — Phase 1.

Phase 2 — Spec Review

Assign to: reviewer

Instruct the reviewer to audit specs for implementation leakage:

• Class names, function names, method names
• Database tables, columns, queries
• API endpoints, HTTP methods, status codes
• Framework terms (controller, service, repository)
• Internal state or data structures

Also verify: one behavior per spec, clarity for non-developers,
language portability.

Gate: Reviewer sends findings. Team lead decides whether specs need
revision. If revisions needed, return to Phase 1.

For the detailed prompt template, see references/prompts.md — Phase 2.

Phase 3 — Pipeline Generation

Assign to: Team lead (self) or implementer

Generate or update the 3-stage test pipeline:

1. Parser — reads specs/*.txt, outputs IR
2. Generator — reads IR, produces runnable tests
3. Runner — run-acceptance-tests.sh

Run acceptance tests after generation. They must fail (red). If they pass,
either the behavior exists or the generator is wrong.

Gate: Acceptance tests fail as expected. Pipeline is functional.

For the detailed prompt template, see references/prompts.md — Phase 3.

Phase 4 — Implementation

Assign to: implementer

Instruct the implementer to:

1. Run acceptance tests — confirm they fail
2. Pick the simplest failing acceptance test
3. Write a unit test, then minimal code to pass it
4. Refactor, repeat until that acceptance test passes
5. Move to next failing acceptance test
6. Continue until ALL acceptance + unit tests pass

Rules for the implementer:

• Never modify spec files — they are the contract
• Never modify generated test files — only regenerate
• If a spec seems wrong, stop and ask the team lead
• Report results of both test streams when done

Gate: Both test streams green. Implementer reports results.

For the detailed prompt template, see references/prompts.md — Phase 4.

Phase 5 — Post-Implementation Review

Assign to: reviewer

Two reviews:

1. Spec review — Run /atdd:spec-check. Check if implementation details
   leaked into specs during development.
2. Code review — Check test quality, code structure, missing edge cases.

Gate: Reviews clean or issues addressed. Team lead approves.

For the detailed prompt template, see references/prompts.md — Phase 5.

Phase 6 — Mutation Testing (Optional)

Assign to: reviewer or implementer

After both test streams are green and reviews pass, run mutation testing
to verify test quality:

1. Run /atdd:mutate to generate mutants and measure mutation score
2. Analyze surviving mutants — identify real test gaps vs. equivalent mutants
3. Run /atdd:kill-mutants to write targeted tests for survivors
4. Re-run mutations to confirm kills

Gate: Mutation score meets target (90%+ recommended). Remaining
survivors documented as equivalent mutants.

For the detailed prompt template, see references/prompts.md — Phase 6.

After Completion

When all phases pass:

1. Run both test streams one final time to confirm green
2. Ask the user whether to commit (do not auto-commit)
3. Ask whether to iterate with the next feature (return to Phase 1)
   or shut down the team

Tips for Team Leads

• Never delegate spec approval. Specs are the team lead's contract.
• Run spec-check twice — before and after implementation.
• Test portability. Verify specs would work for a different implementation language.
• Scope tightly. One feature per cycle. Do not spec the whole system.
• Verify both streams personally before accepting the implementer's work.
• Keep the team informed. When revising specs after review, notify the
  implementer so they don't work against stale specs.

Additional Resources

Reference Files

For detailed prompt templates for each phase:

• references/prompts.md — Copy-paste prompt templates for every phase,
  including the team creation prompt and all agent instructions