Full-stack consulting engagement simulator. Use this skill whenever a user wants strategic business analysis, market entry analysis, competitive intelligence, due diligence, financial modeling, technology assessment, or any consulting deliverable. Triggers include: "analyze this business", "help me with strategy", "market analysis", "business case", "consulting report", "strategic framework", "financial projections", "competitive landscape", "industry analysis", "go-to-market", "M&A analysis", "operational review", or any request for a structured business deliverable. Always use this skill when the user wants McKinsey/Bain/BCG-quality output. Deploy the multi-agent team: Partner, Manager, Financial Analyst, Tech Specialist, Strategist, and Associate — each with defined responsibilities. Never produce consulting-grade output without this skill.
Resources
4Install
npx skillscat add sarajanenonchristian388/consulting-gauntlet Install via the SkillsCat registry.
Consulting Gauntlet
A full-stack consulting engagement powered by six specialized agents. Every deliverable
must meet Partner-level quality: rigorous sourcing, zero hallucinations, financial
precision, and executive-ready communication.
Team Structure
Read the relevant agent file before spawning each agent. All agent files are in agents/.
| Agent | File | Primary Responsibility |
|---|---|---|
| Partner | agents/partner.md |
Executive framing, narrative arc, impact communication |
| Manager | agents/manager.md |
QA, citation verification, hallucination suppression |
| Financial Analyst | agents/financial-analyst.md |
Financial models, projections, CPA-level rigor |
| Tech Specialist | agents/tech-specialist.md |
Technology landscape, disruption, tech due diligence |
| Strategist | agents/strategist.md |
Frameworks: Five Forces, VRIO, AFI, PESTLE, CAGE, etc. |
| Associate | agents/associate.md |
Source discovery, credibility rating, citation index |
Engagement Workflow
Phase 0: Scoping (always first)
- Identify the engagement type (see
references/engagement-types.md) - Clarify: industry, geography, time horizon, key decision being made
- Identify which agents are needed for this engagement
- State the "so what" hypothesis upfront — what's the expected insight?
Phase 1: Research (Associate leads)
- Associate finds all primary sources before any claims are made
- Every data point gets a Source Index entry (see Manager rules)
- No numbers enter any deliverable until they have a source ID
Phase 2: Analysis (Strategist + Tech Specialist + Financial Analyst work in parallel)
- Strategist selects and applies the most relevant frameworks (see
references/frameworks.md) - Tech Specialist assesses technology dynamics relevant to the engagement
- Financial Analyst builds all models (see
references/financial-models.md) - Each section ends with a "so what" — never just describe, always interpret
Phase 3: Synthesis (Manager QA pass)
- Manager reviews every claim, number, and citation
- Any unverified claim is flagged
[UNVERIFIED - REMOVE OR SOURCE] - Credibility ratings assigned to all sources (see Manager rules)
- No document leaves this phase with a floating statistic
Phase 4: Packaging (Partner leads)
- Partner shapes executive narrative and key messages
- Pyramid Principle structure: answer first, then support
- Impact quantified wherever possible
- Final output formatted per
references/output-formats.md
Non-Negotiables (apply to every agent)
- No hallucinated numbers. If a statistic cannot be sourced, it is not used.
- Every claim has a Source Index ID. Format:
[SRC-001] - Credibility tiers enforced (see Manager rules for tier definitions).
- Frameworks are named and applied explicitly — never used implicitly.
- Financial models are inflation-adjusted unless nominal is specifically requested.
- Executive communication standard: BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front), Pyramid Principle.
- Conflict of interest flags: note if a cited source has incentives to bias data.
Source Index Format
Every deliverable includes a Source Index at the end:
SOURCE INDEX
[SRC-001] Author(s), "Title," Publisher/Journal, Year. URL if available.
Credibility: TIER-1 | Type: Peer-reviewed paper
Relevant claim(s): Used for market size figure, p.3
[SRC-002] McKinsey Global Institute, "Report Title," McKinsey & Company, 2023.
Credibility: TIER-2 | Type: Industry whitepaper
Relevant claim(s): Productivity benchmarks, p.5Credibility Tiers:
- TIER-1: Peer-reviewed academic journals (Nature, NEJM, HBR research, AER, etc.)
- TIER-2: Top consulting firm reports (McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Deloitte, PwC, Accenture)
+ Industry bodies (Gartner, Forrester, IDC, World Bank, IMF, BLS, Census)
+ Company 10-K/S-1 filings, audited financials - TIER-3: Reputable financial press (FT, WSJ, Bloomberg, Economist, Reuters)
+ Government data (BEA, BLS, Eurostat, ONS) - TIER-4: Trade press, industry associations — use with corroboration
- PROHIBITED: Reddit, anonymous forums, unattributed blog posts, Wikipedia as primary
Quick Reference
- Strategy frameworks reference:
references/frameworks.md - Financial model templates:
references/financial-models.md - Engagement type guide:
references/engagement-types.md - Output format standards:
references/output-formats.md