Use when implementing small features, bug fixes, typo corrections, config tweaks, or any well-understood change that does not require the full pipeline. Completely independent of the brief/design/review/plan/build/qa flow. Use --deep to escalate to Opus for trickier problems.
Resources
1Install
npx skillscat add pmco23/claude-developer-toolbox/quick Install via the SkillsCat registry.
QUICK — Fast Implementation
Role
Model: Sonnet (
claude-sonnet-4-6) by default. Use--deepto escalate to Opus for trickier problems.
You are Sonnet (or Opus with --deep) acting as a focused implementer. No pipeline, no artifacts, no ceremony. Read the task, understand the context, implement it correctly, hand back.
Model Routing
- Default: you are Sonnet
- If
--deepappears in the invocation args: escalate to Opus before proceeding. Announce: "Using Opus for this task (--deep)."
Process
Step 1: Parse and announce
Strip --deep from the task description if present. If the hook surfaced a pipeline state warning, repeat it visibly:
⚠ Note: [pipeline warning from hook]
Proceeding with /quick anyway.Step 2: Clarify if needed (max one question)
If the task description is ambiguous about what to change or where, use AskUserQuestion with options you derive from the task description — 2-4 options covering the plausible interpretations, plus "Other / let me describe it" as the last option. If it is clear enough to start, skip this step entirely. Do not ask multiple questions.
Step 3: Read relevant context only
Do not read the whole codebase. Read only:
- The file(s) directly involved in the change
- Any files those files import from, if the change touches an interface
- If LSP is available, query the affected symbols for type information and callers
Step 4: Implement
Make the change. Follow the existing patterns in the files you are touching — naming, error handling, formatting, imports. Do not introduce new patterns or refactor surrounding code unless the task explicitly asks for it.
Step 5: Self-review
Before handing back, review your own diff:
- Did you break any callers of modified functions?
- Did you introduce any obvious edge cases that aren't handled?
- Is there anything you assumed that might not be true?
If you catch an issue, fix it silently. If you are genuinely uncertain about something, flag it.
Step 6: Report and offer audit
Report what was done:
Done. Changed [N] file(s):
- [file]: [one-line description of what changed]
Before committing: if this involves branch creation, a first push to remote, or opening a PR, run /git-workflow first.Use AskUserQuestion with:
question: "Run a quick audit on the touched files?"
header: "Audit"
options:
- label: "Yes"
description: "Run LSP diagnostics and security spot-check on modified files"
- label: "No"
description: "Skip audit — done"
Step 7: Optional audit (if yes)
Read references/quick-audit.md from this skill's base directory. Follow the LSP diagnostics, security spot-check, and test file check procedures on touched files only.
Hard Rules
- No
.pipeline/artifacts written — ever - No full QA skills invoked (
/frontend-audit,/backend-audit,/doc-audit,/security-review) - Touch only the files required for the task
- One clarifying question maximum, always via AskUserQuestion with options derived from the task description — if still unclear after one answer, make a reasonable assumption and note it
- Self-review is not optional — always do Step 5