Holistic project health audit using 5 parallel specialist subagents. Analyzes architecture, performance, security, test quality, and dependencies. Produces actionable report with health score. Use quarterly or before major releases.
Resources
1Install
npx skillscat add oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix/phx-audit Install via the SkillsCat registry.
Project Health Audit
Comprehensive project-wide health assessment using 5 parallel specialist subagents.
Usage
/phx:audit # Full audit (default)
/phx:audit --quick # 2-3 minute pulse check
/phx:audit --focus=security # Deep dive single area
/phx:audit --focus=performance
/phx:audit --since abc123 # Incremental audit since commit
/phx:audit --since HEAD~10 # Audit last 10 commitsWhen to Use
- Quarterly health checks
- Before major releases
- After large refactors
- New team member onboarding (understand codebase health)
Subagent Architecture
Spawn 5 specialists in parallel using Task tool:
| Subagent | Focus | Output File |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture Reviewer | Structure quality, coupling, cohesion | arch-review.md |
| Performance Auditor | N+1, indexes, bottlenecks, scalability | perf-audit.md |
| Security Auditor | OWASP scan, auth patterns, secrets | security-audit.md |
| Test Health Auditor | Coverage, quality, flaky tests | test-audit.md |
| Dependency Auditor | Vulnerabilities, outdated, unused | deps-audit.md |
Workflow
Step 1: Spawn All 5 Auditors (Parallel)
Task(subagent_type: "general-purpose", prompt: "Architecture audit...", run_in_background: true)
Task(subagent_type: "general-purpose", prompt: "Performance audit...", run_in_background: true)
Task(subagent_type: "general-purpose", prompt: "Security audit...", run_in_background: true)
Task(subagent_type: "general-purpose", prompt: "Test health audit...", run_in_background: true)
Task(subagent_type: "general-purpose", prompt: "Dependency audit...", run_in_background: true)Agent prompts must be FOCUSED. Scope each prompt to the
relevant directories and patterns. Do NOT give vague prompts
like "analyze the codebase."
Step 2: Collect Results
Wait for ALL auditors to FULLY complete using TaskOutput. If
TaskOutput shows an auditor is still running, wait and check
again. NEVER proceed while any auditor is still running.
Read reports from .claude/audit/reports/.
Step 3: Compress Findings
After all 5 auditors complete, spawn context-supervisor:
Task(subagent_type: "context-supervisor", prompt: """
Compress audit findings.
Input: .claude/audit/reports/
Output: .claude/audit/summaries/
Priority: Health scores per category, critical findings
only, cross-category correlations, deduplicate findings
found by 2+ agents.
""")Read .claude/audit/summaries/consolidated.md for synthesis.
Step 4: Calculate Health Score
Each category scores 0-100. See references/scoring-methodology.md.
Step 5: Generate Report
Write to .claude/audit/summaries/project-health-{date}.md.
Quick Mode (--quick)
Only run essential checks (~2-3 minutes):
mix compile --warnings-as-errors
mix hex.audit && mix deps.audit
mix xref graph --format stats
mix test --trace 2>&1 | tail -20Skip: Full security scan, N+1 analysis, test quality metrics, architecture deep dive.
Focus Mode (--focus=area)
Deep dive single area with full specialist resources:
| Focus | Subagent | Extra Checks |
|---|---|---|
security |
security-analyzer | Full OWASP, sobelow, manual patterns |
performance |
(performance subagent) | Profile-level analysis, query explain |
architecture |
(arch subagent) | Full xref, coupling matrix, cohesion |
tests |
testing-reviewer | Coverage by context, quality metrics |
deps |
(deps subagent) | License audit, maintenance status |
Incremental Mode (--since <commit>)
Analyze only changes since a specific commit. Useful for pre-merge checks:
# Identify changed files
git diff --name-only <commit>...HEAD
# Run targeted audits on changed files only
# Skips full project scan, focuses on modified codeCombines with other flags: /phx:audit --since HEAD~5 --focus=security
Output Format
# Project Health Audit: {project_name}
**Generated**: {date}
**Mode**: full | quick | focus={area}
## Executive Summary
### Health Score: {A-F} ({numeric}/100)
| Category | Score | Status |
|----------|-------|--------|
| Architecture | 85/100 | Good |
| Performance | 70/100 | Needs Attention |
| Security | 95/100 | Excellent |
| Test Quality | 60/100 | Needs Work |
| Dependencies | 90/100 | Good |
### Critical Issues (Must Address)
1. {issue}
2. {issue}
### Top Recommendations
1. {recommendation}
2. {recommendation}
## Detailed Findings
[Per-category sections from subagents]
## Action Plan
### Immediate (This Sprint)
- [ ] {critical fix}
### Short-term (Next 2 Sprints)
- [ ] {improvement}
### Long-term (Backlog)
- [ ] {nice-to-have}Relationship to Other Commands
| Command | Scope | Frequency |
|---|---|---|
/phx:review |
Changed files (diff) | Every PR |
/phx:audit |
Entire project | Quarterly |
/phx:boundaries |
Context structure | On-demand |
/phx:verify |
Compile/test pass | Anytime |
References
references/scoring-methodology.md- How scores are calculatedreferences/architecture-checks.md- Detailed architecture criteria