Customer Health Analyst
Expert guidance for customer health scoring, predictive analytics, and data-driven customer success strategies. Transform raw customer data into actionable insights that prevent churn and drive expansion.
Philosophy
Customer health is not a single metric — it's a predictive system:
- Measure what matters — Health scores should predict outcomes, not just track activity
- Lead, don't lag — Focus on indicators that predict churn before it's too late
- Segment for action — Different customers need different interventions
- Automate detection — Scale health monitoring across your entire customer base
- Close the loop — Analytics without action is just expensive data collection
How This Skill Works
When invoked, apply the guidelines in rules/ organized by:
health-* — Health score design, weighting, and calibration
indicators-* — Leading vs lagging indicator analysis
churn-* — Prediction modeling and early warning systems
usage-* — Analytics and adoption metrics
risk-* — Identification, escalation, and intervention
data-* — Enrichment and customer 360 development
cohort-* — Analysis and benchmarking
executive-* — Reporting and dashboards
segmentation-* — Customer tiers and scoring models
Core Frameworks
The Health Score Hierarchy
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ COMPOSITE HEALTH SCORE │
│ (0-100) │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ │
│ ┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐ │
│ │ PRODUCT │ │ENGAGEMENT│ │ GROWTH │ │ SUPPORT │ │
│ │ USAGE │ │ │ │ SIGNALS │ │ HEALTH │ │
│ │ (35%) │ │ (25%) │ │ (20%) │ │ (20%) │ │
│ └──────────┘ └──────────┘ └──────────┘ └──────────┘ │
│ │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ COMPONENT METRICS │
│ │
│ Usage: Engagement: Growth: Support: │
│ - DAU/MAU - NPS score - Seat trend - Ticket volume │
│ - Features - CSM meetings - Usage trend - Resolution time │
│ - Depth - Email opens - Expansion - Sentiment │
│ - Breadth - Logins - Contract - Escalations │
│ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Leading vs Lagging Indicators
| Type |
Definition |
Examples |
Action Window |
| Leading |
Predict future outcomes |
Usage decline, engagement drop |
60-90 days |
| Coincident |
Move with outcomes |
Support sentiment, NPS |
30-60 days |
| Lagging |
Confirm after the fact |
Churn, revenue loss |
Too late |
Customer Health States
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ │
│ THRIVING ──→ HEALTHY ──→ NEUTRAL ──→ AT-RISK ──→ CRITICAL │
│ (85+) (70-84) (50-69) (30-49) (<30) │
│ │
│ Expand Monitor Engage Intervene Escalate │
│ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Health Score Components
| Component |
Weight |
Key Metrics |
Why It Matters |
| Product Usage |
30-40% |
DAU/MAU, feature adoption, depth |
Usage predicts value realization |
| Engagement |
20-25% |
NPS, CSM contact, responsiveness |
Relationship strength indicator |
| Growth Signals |
15-20% |
Seat expansion, usage trend |
Investment signals commitment |
| Support Health |
15-20% |
Ticket volume, sentiment, resolution |
Frustration predicts churn |
| Financial |
5-10% |
Payment history, contract length |
Financial commitment level |
Churn Risk Factors
| Factor |
Risk Weight |
Detection Method |
| Champion departure |
Critical |
Contact tracking, LinkedIn |
| Usage decline >30% |
High |
Product analytics |
| Negative NPS (0-6) |
High |
Survey responses |
| Support escalations |
High |
Ticket analysis |
| Missed renewal meeting |
High |
CSM activity tracking |
| Contract downgrade |
Very High |
Billing data |
| Competitor mentions |
High |
Call transcripts, tickets |
| Budget review mentions |
Medium |
CSM notes |
The Analytics Stack
| Layer |
Purpose |
Tools/Methods |
| Collection |
Gather raw data |
Product events, CRM, support |
| Processing |
Clean and transform |
ETL, data pipelines |
| Calculation |
Compute scores |
Scoring algorithms |
| Storage |
Historical tracking |
Data warehouse |
| Visualization |
Present insights |
Dashboards, reports |
| Action |
Trigger interventions |
Alerting, automation |
Key Metrics
| Metric |
Formula |
Target |
| Health Score Accuracy |
Churn predicted / Actual churn |
>70% |
| Leading Indicator Correlation |
Correlation to outcomes |
>0.6 |
| Score Distribution |
% in each health tier |
Bell curve |
| Intervention Success Rate |
Saved / Intervened |
>40% |
| Time to Detection |
Days before risk → action |
<14 days |
| False Positive Rate |
False alerts / Total alerts |
<20% |
Executive Dashboard KPIs
| KPI |
Definition |
Benchmark |
| Gross Revenue Retention |
Retained ARR / Starting ARR |
85-95% |
| Net Revenue Retention |
(Retained + Expansion) / Starting |
100-130% |
| Logo Retention |
Retained customers / Starting |
90-95% |
| Health Score Average |
Mean across customer base |
65-75 |
| At-Risk Revenue |
ARR with health <50 |
<15% |
| Expansion Rate |
Customers expanded / Total |
15-30% |
Cohort Analysis Framework
| Cohort Type |
Segments By |
Use Case |
| Time-based |
Sign-up month/quarter |
Retention trends |
| Behavioral |
Feature usage patterns |
Activation success |
| Value-based |
ARR tier |
Segment economics |
| Industry |
Vertical |
Product-market fit |
| Acquisition |
Channel/source |
Marketing efficiency |
Anti-Patterns
- Vanity health scores — Scores that look good but don't predict outcomes
- Over-weighted product usage — Ignoring relationship and sentiment signals
- Lagging indicator focus — Measuring what already happened
- One-size-fits-all thresholds — Same scores mean different things for different segments
- Manual-only health tracking — Can't scale without automation
- Score without action — Calculating risk without intervention playbooks
- Annual calibration only — Health models need continuous refinement
- Ignoring data quality — Garbage in, garbage out