hwjxp

us-5x-stock-research

Use when the user wants to study, screen, or review U.S. stocks with potential to become 5x to 10x multi-baggers. Supports regime analysis, theme selection, leader identification, catalyst mapping, market-cap and float filters, technical entry review, and post-mortem comparison against historical U.S. 5x winners. Also use when the user wants a repeatable investing framework or stock-picking checklist focused on major winners rather than broad diversification.

hwjxp 0 Updated 1mo ago

Resources

3
GitHub

Install

npx skillscat add hwjxp/us-5x-stock-research

Install via the SkillsCat registry.

SKILL.md

US 5x Stock Research

Use this skill to study U.S. stocks through the lens of 5x-10x winner selection.

This skill is not for:

  • generic retirement allocation
  • passive ETF portfolio construction
  • options Greeks modeling without a stock thesis
  • penny-stock pumping without business, liquidity, and catalyst validation

Core Goal

Find stocks where the market is still underestimating:

  • the size of the opportunity
  • the speed of the inflection
  • the strength of the leader
  • the durability of the trend

The working model is:

regime -> theme -> leader -> catalyst -> sizing -> technical execution

Quick Start

Good invocations:

  • 用这个 skill 帮我筛美股里最像下一只 5x 的票。
  • 分析这只股票有没有成为 5x 龙头的潜力。
  • 把这份候选名单按 5x 潜力打分。
  • 复盘过去 10 年的 5x 股共性。
  • 帮我看这只票现在是不是技术上适合买点。

When this skill triggers:

  1. Identify whether the task is screen, single-name deep dive, historical study, or trade timing.
  2. Use live sources for current prices, market caps, earnings dates, and other unstable financial facts.
  3. Separate clean full-year historical samples from special-case samples such as spinoffs or relistings.
  4. Judge the stock first on business and catalyst quality, then on chart structure.
  5. Return a decision-ready output with explicit invalidation conditions.

Workflow

1. Regime Check

Start with market backdrop:

  • liquidity and rates
  • risk appetite
  • whether the market is rewarding early growth, turnarounds, cyclicals, or pure narrative
  • whether 5x names are broadening or concentrated in one theme

Read:

2. Theme Selection

Prefer themes where a few leaders can capture outsized economics:

  • AI infrastructure / software re-acceleration
  • biotech with major readouts or first-in-class potential
  • energy, shipping, commodities, or hardware when supply-demand shifts are extreme
  • crypto-adjacent equities when liquidity and narrative align
  • turnaround stories only when balance-sheet survival is credible

Avoid treating every hot story as a valid theme. A real theme should have capital flow, earnings-path relevance, or a hard catalyst chain.

3. Leader Filter

Prefer names that are already leader or clear strong number two:

  • strongest revenue or user acceleration
  • clearest category positioning
  • best product or cost curve
  • improving margins or balance sheet
  • enough liquidity for institutional participation

Use the detailed scoring dimensions in:

4. Market Cap and Float Filter

For 5x studies, focus on the sweet spot where upside is still mathematically possible but liquidity is real.

Default framing:

  • under $500M: extreme risk, often too noisy unless catalyst quality is exceptional
  • $500M-$5B: fertile 5x zone, but survival and liquidity need more scrutiny
  • $5B-$30B: best balance of scale, credibility, and multi-bagger room
  • above $30B: still investable, but 5x usually requires a rare re-rating and major earnings expansion

Always inspect:

  • free-float quality
  • average dollar volume
  • short interest
  • recent dilution or unlock risk

5. Technical Execution

Do not treat 5x winners as random bottom bounces.

Prefer charts that already show:

  • reclaim of 50DMA
  • reclaim of 200DMA
  • breakout above a meaningful base or prior range
  • volume expansion on the breakout
  • ability to trend above 50DMA after breakout

Use:

6. Historical Anchoring

When comparing a candidate against past winners:

  1. Use only relevant analogs.
  2. Flag whether the analog is a persistent trend leader, high-beta momentum trend, event-driven revaluation, or mania/squeeze.
  3. Do not anchor on distorted samples without noting the distortion.

Use:

7. Output

Prefer a decision-ready structure:

  • thesis
  • why now
  • what must happen for 5x to remain possible
  • technical setup
  • invalidation
  • ranking versus other candidates

Use:

Technical Rules

  • A stock can be early fundamentally but should not be technically broken unless the user explicitly wants deep-value turnaround hunting.
  • When a name is already far above 50DMA, distinguish healthy leadership from late-stage euphoria.
  • Treat violent squeeze patterns and steady institutional trends as different species.
  • For historical studies, summarize chart behavior rather than narrating every candle.
  • Separate selection quality from execution quality; a good stock bought badly can still be a poor trade.
  • Prefer staged entry, staged adds, and staged trimming over all-in / all-out behavior.

Research Rules

  • Use live sources for unstable facts such as price, market cap, earnings date, current float, guidance, and analyst expectations.
  • Prefer primary or company sources for catalysts: earnings releases, investor decks, FDA updates, SEC filings, company blogs, and exchange announcements.
  • Be explicit when a conclusion is inference rather than directly stated by a source.
  • If a historical sample is a spinoff, relisting, ticker-history distortion, or merger artifact, mark it as special-case before using it as a pattern anchor.

Default Deliverables

Depending on the request, return one of these:

  • 5x Potential Scorecard
  • Historical Analog Review
  • Technical Setup Review
  • Buy / Add / Trim / Exit Plan
  • 中文评分卡
  • 中文执行清单
  • Entry / Exit Plan
  • Position Sizing Plan
  • Trade Management Playbook

Resources