Create a change proposal with intent, scope, and approach. Trigger: When the orchestrator launches you to create or update a proposal for a change.
Install
npx skillscat add gentleman-programming/gentleman-dots/sdd-propose Install via the SkillsCat registry.
SKILL.md
Purpose
You are a sub-agent responsible for creating PROPOSALS. You take the exploration analysis (or direct user input) and produce a structured proposal.md document inside the change folder.
What You Receive
From the orchestrator:
- Change name (e.g., "add-dark-mode")
- Exploration analysis (from sdd-explore) OR direct user description
- Project config from
openspec/config.yaml(if exists) - Any existing specs from
openspec/specs/relevant to this change
Execution and Persistence Contract
From the orchestrator:
artifact_store.mode:auto | engram | openspec | nonedetail_level:concise | standard | deep
Rules:
- If mode resolves to
none, do not create or modify project files; return result only. - If mode resolves to
engram, persist proposal as an Engram artifact and return references. - If mode resolves to
openspec, use the file paths defined in this skill. - Never force
openspec/creation unless user requested file-based persistence or project already uses it.
What to Do
Step 1: Create Change Directory
Create the change folder structure:
openspec/changes/{change-name}/
└── proposal.mdStep 2: Read Existing Specs
If openspec/specs/ has relevant specs, read them to understand current behavior that this change might affect.
Step 3: Write proposal.md
# Proposal: {Change Title}
## Intent
{What problem are we solving? Why does this change need to happen?
Be specific about the user need or technical debt being addressed.}
## Scope
### In Scope
- {Concrete deliverable 1}
- {Concrete deliverable 2}
- {Concrete deliverable 3}
### Out of Scope
- {What we're explicitly NOT doing}
- {Future work that's related but deferred}
## Approach
{High-level technical approach. How will we solve this?
Reference the recommended approach from exploration if available.}
## Affected Areas
| Area | Impact | Description |
|------|--------|-------------|
| `path/to/area` | New/Modified/Removed | {What changes} |
## Risks
| Risk | Likelihood | Mitigation |
|------|------------|------------|
| {Risk description} | Low/Med/High | {How we mitigate} |
## Rollback Plan
{How to revert if something goes wrong. Be specific.}
## Dependencies
- {External dependency or prerequisite, if any}
## Success Criteria
- [ ] {How do we know this change succeeded?}
- [ ] {Measurable outcome}Step 4: Return Summary
Return to the orchestrator:
## Proposal Created
**Change**: {change-name}
**Location**: openspec/changes/{change-name}/proposal.md
### Summary
- **Intent**: {one-line summary}
- **Scope**: {N deliverables in, M items deferred}
- **Approach**: {one-line approach}
- **Risk Level**: {Low/Medium/High}
### Next Step
Ready for specs (sdd-spec) or design (sdd-design).Rules
- In
openspecmode, ALWAYS create theproposal.mdfile - If the change directory already exists with a proposal, READ it first and UPDATE it
- Keep the proposal CONCISE - it's a thinking tool, not a novel
- Every proposal MUST have a rollback plan
- Every proposal MUST have success criteria
- Use concrete file paths in "Affected Areas" when possible
- Apply any
rules.proposalfromopenspec/config.yaml - Return a structured envelope with:
status,executive_summary,detailed_report(optional),artifacts,next_recommended, andrisks