Cell-Free Protein Synthesis (CFPS)
System Selection Guide
| System |
Best For |
Yield |
PTMs |
Disulfides |
Cost |
| E. coli extract |
Rapid prototyping, prokaryotic proteins |
High (100-400 μg/mL) |
None |
Poor (reducing) |
Low |
| E. coli PURE |
Defined conditions, unnatural AAs |
Medium (50-150 μg/mL) |
None |
Controllable |
High |
| Wheat germ |
Eukaryotic proteins, membrane proteins |
High (100-500 μg/mL) |
Limited |
Moderate |
Medium |
| Rabbit reticulocyte |
Mammalian proteins, post-translational studies |
Low (10-50 μg/mL) |
Some |
Poor |
High |
| Insect (Sf21) |
Glycoproteins, complex folds |
Medium (50-100 μg/mL) |
Glycosylation |
Good |
High |
| HeLa/CHO |
Native mammalian proteins |
Low (10-50 μg/mL) |
Full mammalian |
Good |
Very High |
CFPS Troubleshooting Matrix
| Problem |
Likely Causes |
Design Fix |
Reagent Fix |
| No expression |
Rare codons at N-terminus, poor RBS |
Codon optimize first 30 codons |
Use BL21-CodonPlus extract |
| Low yield |
Strong mRNA secondary structure, template issues |
Optimize 5' UTR (ΔG > -5 kcal/mol) |
Increase Mg²⁺ (10-18 mM), ATP |
| Aggregation |
Hydrophobic protein, fast translation |
Add solubility tags (MBP, SUMO) |
Add 0.1% Tween-20, chaperones |
| Inactive protein |
Misfolding, missing cofactors |
Slow translation (use rare codons!) |
Add GroEL/ES, DnaK/J |
| Truncation |
Rare codon clusters, mRNA instability |
Remove AGG/AGA/CUA clusters |
Supplement rare tRNAs |
| Degradation |
Proteolysis |
N-terminal Met-Ala |
Add protease inhibitors |
Codon Optimization for CFPS
Codons to Avoid in E. coli CFPS
| Codon |
Amino Acid |
Issue |
tRNA Abundance |
| AGG |
Arg |
Very rare, stalling |
0.2% |
| AGA |
Arg |
Very rare, stalling |
0.4% |
| CUA |
Leu |
Low abundance |
0.4% |
| AUA |
Ile |
Rare |
0.5% |
| CGA |
Arg |
Inefficient decoding |
0.6% |
| CCC |
Pro |
Can cause pausing |
0.5% |
| GGA |
Gly |
Moderate |
1.1% |
Design Rules
- First 30 codons: Most critical - use only high-frequency codons
- Rare codon clusters: Avoid 2+ rare codons within 10 nt
- Rare codon content: Keep overall <5% of coding sequence
- GC content: Target 40-60% for balanced expression
- Avoid runs: No >6 consecutive G or C residues (secondary structure)
- Strategic slow codons: Place rare codons between domains (aids folding!)
When to Use Rare Codons
- Domain boundaries (allow cotranslational folding)
- Before complex structural elements
- When protein is prone to misfolding
mRNA Template Design
5' UTR Optimization
| Element |
Optimal Design |
Impact |
| RBS (SD sequence) |
AGGAGG, 7-9 nt from start |
Ribosome binding |
| Spacing |
7 nt between SD and AUG |
Translation initiation |
| Secondary structure |
ΔG > -5 kcal/mol |
Accessibility |
| Upstream AUG |
Avoid (causes false starts) |
Reduces truncations |
Secondary Structure Targets
| Region |
Ideal ΔG |
Impact |
| -30 to +30 around AUG |
> -5 kcal/mol |
Translation initiation |
| Full 5' UTR |
> -10 kcal/mol |
Ribosome loading |
| RBS accessibility |
Unpaired |
Critical |
Template Format
| Format |
Advantages |
Disadvantages |
| Plasmid |
Stable, high yield |
Requires cloning |
| Linear PCR |
Fast, no cloning |
May need stabilization |
| mRNA |
Direct translation |
Unstable, expensive |
Disulfide Bond Formation
System Capabilities
| System |
Native Disulfide Support |
Additives Needed |
| Standard E. coli extract |
Poor (DTT present) |
IAM, PDI, GSSG/GSH |
| Oxidizing E. coli extract |
Good |
Pre-oxidized glutathione |
| Wheat germ |
Moderate |
Lower DTT, add PDI |
| PURE system |
Minimal |
Full oxidative system |
| Insect/Mammalian |
Good |
Microsome membranes |
Oxidative Folding Protocol (E. coli extract)
1. Deplete DTT from extract (dialysis or treatment with IAM 5 mM)
2. Add oxidized/reduced glutathione: 4 mM GSSG, 1 mM GSH (4:1 ratio)
3. Add 10 μM PDI (protein disulfide isomerase)
4. Optional: Add 5 μM DsbC (disulfide isomerase)
5. Express at 25°C (not 37°C) for better folding
6. Incubation time: 4-6 hours
Disulfide-Rich Protein Tips
- Start with wheat germ or oxidizing extract
- Use PURE system for precise control
- Consider co-expression of PDI/DsbC
- Verify by non-reducing SDS-PAGE
Expression Prediction from Sequence
| Feature |
Good |
Marginal |
Bad |
| Rare codon content |
<3% |
3-8% |
>10% |
| First 30 codons rare |
0 |
1-2 |
>2 |
| GC content |
45-55% |
35-45% or 55-65% |
<30% or >70% |
| 5' UTR ΔG |
> -3 kcal/mol |
-3 to -8 |
< -10 kcal/mol |
| Hydrophobic stretches |
<5 consecutive |
5-7 |
>8 consecutive |
| N-terminal residue |
Met-Ala, Met-Ser, Met-Gly |
Met-Val, Met-Thr |
Met-Arg, Met-Lys |
| Cysteine pairs |
Paired (even number) |
Mixed |
Odd number (free thiols) |
Solubility Enhancement Strategies
Fusion Tags (ranked by effectiveness)
| Tag |
Size |
Solubility Enhancement |
Cleavage |
Notes |
| MBP |
40 kDa |
Excellent |
TEV, Factor Xa |
Best overall |
| SUMO |
11 kDa |
Very Good |
SUMO protease |
Native N-terminus after cleavage |
| NusA |
55 kDa |
Excellent |
- |
Large size |
| Trx |
12 kDa |
Good |
Enterokinase |
For disulfide proteins |
| GST |
26 kDa |
Moderate |
- |
Dimeric |
| His₆ |
1 kDa |
Minimal |
- |
Mainly for purification |
Buffer Additives for Solubility
| Additive |
Concentration |
Mechanism |
| Trehalose |
50-100 mM |
Chemical chaperone |
| Glycerol |
5-10% |
Reduces hydrophobic aggregation |
| L-Arginine |
50-100 mM |
Suppresses aggregation |
| Tween-20 |
0.05-0.1% |
Prevents surface adsorption |
| Proline |
50 mM |
Osmolyte stabilization |
Chaperone Supplementation
| Chaperone System |
Target Problem |
Concentration |
| GroEL/GroES |
General folding |
1-2 μM |
| DnaK/DnaJ/GrpE |
Aggregation-prone |
1 μM each |
| Trigger Factor |
Nascent chain |
1-2 μM |
| ClpB |
Aggregate resolubilization |
0.5 μM |
Temperature Optimization
| Temperature |
Use Case |
Trade-offs |
| 37°C |
Fast expression, stable proteins |
Higher aggregation risk |
| 30°C |
Balanced (default) |
Good compromise |
| 25°C |
Disulfide proteins, complex folds |
Slower, better folding |
| 18-20°C |
Aggregation-prone proteins |
Much slower, best folding |
| 16°C |
Cold-shock proteins |
Very slow, specialized |
E. coli Extract Preparation (Key Variables)
| Variable |
Impact |
Optimal Range |
| Cell density at harvest |
Ribosome content |
OD₆₀₀ 2.5-3.5 |
| Lysis method |
Extract activity |
Sonication, bead beating |
| Run-off reaction |
Removes endogenous mRNA |
20-80 min at 37°C |
| Mg²⁺ concentration |
Translation fidelity |
10-18 mM |
| K⁺ concentration |
Translation rate |
150-200 mM |
| Energy system |
Sustained synthesis |
ATP/GTP, creatine phosphate |
PURE System Specifics
Advantages
- Defined composition (no proteases/nucleases)
- Linear DNA templates work well
- Unnatural amino acid incorporation
- Reproducible between batches
Limitations
- No chaperones (add separately)
- No post-translational modifications
- Lower yields than crude extracts
- Higher cost
When to Use PURE
- Unnatural amino acid incorporation
- Studying translation mechanisms
- "Clean" proteins needed
- Protease-sensitive targets
- Linear template expression
Common Artifacts and Solutions
Low Molecular Weight Bands
Causes: Premature termination, proteolysis, internal initiation
Solutions:
- Optimize rare codon clusters
- Add protease inhibitors
- Check for internal AUG codons
- Use PURE system
Higher MW Bands
Causes: Incomplete termination, read-through, aggregation
Solutions:
- Ensure strong stop codon (UAA preferred)
- Check template 3' end
- Add release factors (RF1/RF2)
- Reduce protein concentration
No Soluble Protein
Causes: Aggregation during synthesis
Solutions:
- Lower temperature (25°C → 18°C)
- Add chaperones
- Use solubility tag
- Optimize translation rate
References
CFPS Overview
Extract Preparation
PURE System
Wheat Germ
Codon Optimization
Disulfide Formation
Solubility Tags
Temperature Effects