Code Review
Automated code review and analysis
plain-language
by ggwicz
Reviews project text — documentation, READMEs, marketing copy, UI strings, code comments, error messages — for compliance with the U.S. federal government Plain Language Guidelines. Produces structured edit recommendations with concrete rewrites. Activates on plain language review, readability check, copy audit, "make this clearer," or "improve the writing."
review-flow
by HikaruEgashira
PR作成後に自律的に実行する必要があるフロースキルです。 Trigger: review, pr created, pr open
doc-sync-sentinel
by famaoai-creator
Automatically synchronizes documentation with code changes. Detects drift between source code and READMEs, Wikis, or comments, and suggests autonomous updates.
pr
by LuisUrrutia
Create or update GitHub pull requests. Use when user says "pr", "/pr", "create pr", "open pr", "pull request", or asks to submit changes for review. Requires gh CLI.
decompose-plan
by shuymn
"Decomposes an approved design document into a TDD-based implementation plan or reviews an existing plan (mode=create review). Create mode: task breakdown with traceability. Review mode: independent sub-agent verification absorbing the former analyze-plan audit. Use after design-doc approval when the user needs to break down a design into executable tasks, create an implementation plan, or generate a task list from a design."
doc-generator-strategy
by samChang72
Use when generating or improving user manuals or documentation strategies. Focuses on Code-First Analysis, Process Restoration, and Structured Standards.
security-reviewer
by k1lgor
Use this when the user asks for a security review, vulnerability check, or wants to know if code is safe. Focus on common issues like injection, broken auth, insecure defaults, and sensitive data exposure.
pre-commit-review
by ichuan
"Comprehensive code review for uncommitted changes before git commit. Use when users want to: (1) Review code changes before committing, (2) Check for security vulnerabilities, bugs, or performance issues, (3) Get feedback on code quality and best practices, (4) Identify issues by severity level. Triggered by phrases like 'review my changes', 'check my code', 'review before commit', 'code review', or similar requests for pre-commit validation."
post-quantum-shield
by famaoai-creator
Output path for report
bootstrap-forms
by sjnims
This skill should be used when the user asks about Bootstrap forms, Bootstrap form controls, Bootstrap input fields, Bootstrap select, Bootstrap checkboxes, Bootstrap radio buttons, Bootstrap switches, Bootstrap range inputs, Bootstrap input groups, Bootstrap floating labels, Bootstrap form validation, Bootstrap form layout, how to create Bootstrap forms, needs help with form styling and validation in Bootstrap, wants to create a form, add form validation, style form inputs, make an inline form, add floating labels to inputs, create a login form, build a registration form, or validate user input.
scholar-evaluation
by Victory-Hugo
"应用 ScholarEval 框架对学术与科研成果进行系统化评估。该技能基于同行评审研究评价标准，提供结构化评估方法，可对学术论文、科研项目申请书、文献综述及各类学术写作在多个质量维度上进行全面分析。"
worktree
by HikaruEgashira
Planが承認/完了した直後に自律的に呼び出す必要があるスキルです。 Trigger: plan approved, plan completed, taskを開始します
scientific-schematics
by Victory-Hugo
"使用 Nano Banana Pro AI 创建可发表级别的科学示意图，并支持智能迭代优化。使用 Gemini 3 Pro 进行质量审查；仅当质量低于当前文档类型要求阈值时才会重新生成。专注于神经网络架构图、系统架构图、流程图、生物通路图以及复杂科学可视化图表。"
explain
by laststance
Deep, systematic explanation of code, concepts, and system behavior. Always operates at advanced level with introspection markers and validation. Analyzes target thoroughly before explaining, verifies accuracy after. Use when: - User asks "what does this do", "how does this work", "explain this" - User wants to understand code, architecture, or a concept in depth - User points to a file, function, or system and asks for explanation - User says "explain", "walk me through", "teach me", "break down" Keywords: explain, understand, how, what, why, walk through, teach, break down, clarify
review-skill-parallel
by corygabrielsen
Review a skill document with n parallel reviewers. Synthesizes findings, addresses issues, verifies changes, gets human approvals (plan and confirmation).
copy-editing
by sarfraznawaz2005
"When the user wants to edit, review, or improve existing marketing copy. Also use when the user mentions 'edit this copy,' 'review my copy,' 'copy feedback,' 'proofread,' 'polish this,' 'make this better,' or 'copy sweep.' This skill provides a systematic approach to editing marketing copy through multiple focused passes."
skill-review
by rarestg
Review an agent skill for quality, completeness, and correctness. Evaluates purpose, approach, implementation, frontmatter, progressive disclosure, and whether scripts or references are needed. Use after creating or modifying a skill.
evo-executing-plans
by rockcookies
Use when you have a written implementation plan to execute in a separate session with review checkpoints
coding-agent
by rarestg
Orchestrate Codex CLI and Claude Code as background assistants via tmux. Think of them as your team — delegate freely. Use when you want to: get a second opinion on your work; delegate research or context-heavy tasks; fan out work in parallel (map-reduce across agents); run the same instruction across many items; fix issues in parallel with worktrees; or build something end-to-end (research → plan → phased implementation → review). Triggers on: "run codex", "use claude on", "spawn an agent", "second opinion", "delegate", "fan out", "review my work", "build with agents".
bug-hunter
by k1lgor
Use this when the user reports an error, a crash, a bug, or provides a stack trace.
task-os
by rarestg
Operating protocol that uses Taskwarrior as the continuity layer across conversations. Grounds every interaction in real task state before acting. Activate on "morning" / "briefing" for daily overview, on "status" / "what's next" for current state, when capturing tasks ("remind me to", "add task", "I need to"), when recovering from stalls, or when executing structured work across projects, repos, and life domains.
compliance-officer
by famaoai-creator
status: implemented
vuln-research
by NikitosHanik4
安全研究元思考方法论 - 从先知社区5600+篇安全文档中提炼的漏洞挖掘方法论框架。 Use this skill when: - 进行漏洞挖掘和安全研究时，需要系统化的思考框架 - 分析特定类型漏洞（Web注入、反序列化、二进制、域渗透等）的攻击路径 - 需要了解绕过防护措施（WAF、EDR、沙箱）的思维模式 - 进行代码审计需要Source-Sink分析方法论 - 红队攻防需要完整攻击链规划 - CTF竞赛需要快速解题思路 - 逆向分析恶意软件需要方法论指导 Triggers: 漏洞挖掘、安全研究、渗透测试、代码审计、红队攻防、CTF、逆向分析、 WAF绕过、免杀、提权、横向移动、域渗透、反序列化、二进制安全、Fuzzing
eslint-prettier-husky-config
by hopeoverture
This skill should be used when setting up code quality tooling with ESLint v9 flat config, Prettier formatting, Husky git hooks, lint-staged pre-commit checks, and GitHub Actions CI lint workflow. Apply when initializing linting, adding code formatting, configuring pre-commit hooks, setting up quality gates, or establishing lint CI checks for Next.js or React projects.