- Home
- /
- Categories
- /
- Code Review
Code Review
Automated code review and analysis
decide
by doodledood
'Personal decision advisor for QUALITY over speed. Exhaustive discovery, option finding, sequential elimination, structured analysis. Use for investments, purchases, career, life decisions. Surfaces hidden factors, tracks eliminations with reasons, confident recommendations. Triggers: help me decide, should I, which should I choose, compare options, what should I do, weighing options.'
consultant
by doodledood
'Consults external AI models (100+ via LiteLLM) for complex analysis. Use for architectural review, security audit, deep code understanding, or when extended reasoning is needed. Runs async with session management.'
codebase-overview
by lis186
Quickly understand a new codebase's architecture, tech stack, and patterns. Use when user asks "what is this project", "project overview", "how is this codebase structured", "what tech stack", or when onboarding to a new codebase.
research-scoping
by dozybot001
Guidelines for scoping research ideas into actionable tasks. Use when the root idea is broad or ambiguous to ensure appropriate granularity and feasibility. Helps with initial decomposition. Apply at root (task "0") and when refining broad sub-tasks.
polizy-troubleshooting
by bratsos
Debug and fix polizy authorization issues. Use when permission checks fail unexpectedly, errors occur, or authorization behavior is confusing. Covers check algorithm, common issues, and anti-patterns.
dev-experts
by DeevsDeevs
"Apply opinionated developer personas for architecture decisions, production debugging, language-specific code review, comprehensive reviewer passes, and test strategy. Use when you need an architect plan, devops investigation, Rust/Python/C++ review, grumpy reviewer audit, or tester-driven test plan. Triggers: architect, devops, rust-dev, python-dev, cpp-dev, reviewer, tester, pre-merge review, refactor for maintainability."
97-dev
by DeevsDeevs
Apply timeless programming wisdom from "97 Things Every Programmer Should Know" when writing, reviewing, or refactoring code. Use for design decisions, code quality checks, professional development guidance, testing strategies, and workflow optimization.
gplay-vitals-monitoring
by tamtom
App vitals monitoring for crashes, ANRs, performance metrics, and errors via gplay vitals commands. Use when asked to check app stability, crash rates, ANR rates, or performance data from Google Play Console.
clear
by lis186
Clear saved SourceAtlas analysis results
polizy-patterns
by bratsos
Implementation patterns for polizy authorization. Use when implementing team access, folder inheritance, field-level permissions, temporary access, revocation, or any specific authorization scenario.
response-quality-analysis
by m31uk3
"Analyze whether your response addresses the actual question asked before posting. Use when: (1) About to post response to forum/Slack question, (2) Want to validate response coverage, (3) Need to ensure solving the right problem, (4) Want specific improvement suggestions for gaps in response"
decomposition-patterns
by dozybot001
Common patterns for decomposing research tasks. Use when decomposing complex tasks to ensure MECE (mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive) splits and clear phase boundaries. Essential for Decompose tool. Apply when CheckAtomicity returns atomic=false.
gourmet-research
by narumiruna
Use when creating or updating evidence-based gourmet research outputs for cities (restaurants/cafes/desserts) that require multi-source evidence, standardized scoring, and structured city folders.
gplay-rollout-management
by tamtom
Staged rollout orchestration and monitoring for Google Play releases. Use when implementing gradual release strategies.
history-analyzer
by lis186
Analyze git history for hotspots, coupling, and knowledge distribution. Use when user asks "who knows this code", "what files change most", "hotspots", "bus factor", "knowledge silos", or needs to understand code evolution.
flow
by lis186
Extract business logic flow from code, trace execution path from entry point
coderabbit-cli
by lambda-curry
Use CodeRabbit CLI to perform automated code review and iterative improvement in an AI agent workflow. Use when: (1) After generating non-trivial code (new features, refactors, algorithms), (2) Improving code quality, maintainability, or readability before submission, (3) Validating code changes against best practices, (4) Exploring unfamiliar languages, patterns, or domains, or (5) Creating a self-reviewing coding loop. Requires CodeRabbit CLI installed and authenticated. Not for trivial changes (typos, formatting-only) or rapid prototyping without quality constraints.
dependency-analyzer
by lis186
Analyze dependencies for upgrade planning and migration. Use when user asks "upgrade to X", "migrate from X to Y", "what breaks if we upgrade", "iOS 17 migration", "React 18 upgrade", or planning framework/SDK upgrades.
codebase-study-guide
by petekp
"Generate a pedagogically-grounded study guide for learning an unfamiliar codebase. Use when the user wants to onboard onto a codebase, understand a project's architecture, create learning materials for a team, or asks things like \"help me learn this codebase\", \"create an onboarding guide\", \"I'm new to this project\", \"how does this system work\", \"study guide for this repo\", or \"explain this codebase to me\". Produces a structured document that builds understanding from purpose to systems to patterns, using evidence-based learning techniques (elaborative interrogation, concept mapping, threshold concepts, worked examples, progressive disclosure)."
using-git-worktrees
by futuregerald
Use when starting feature work that needs isolation from current workspace or before executing implementation plans - creates isolated git worktrees with smart directory selection and safety verification
review-package
by petekp
Create a self-contained review package of current work for external review by another AI model or human reviewer. Bundles relevant files with a contextual README and instructional prompt. Triggers: "review package", "create review package", "hand off for review", "get a second opinion", "external code review", "cross-model review", "package for review", "prepare code review". Accepts an optional focus area argument to scope the analysis.
unix-macos-engineer
by petekp
Expert Unix and macOS systems engineer for shell scripting, system administration, command-line tools, launchd, Homebrew, networking, and low-level system tasks. Use when the user asks about Unix commands, shell scripts, macOS system configuration, process management, or troubleshooting system issues.
code-review
by yelban
互動式程式碼審查:逐段檢視架構、程式品質、測試、效能。 可審查 git diff、指定檔案、或整個 PR。 觸發詞:/code-review、review code、審查程式碼、code review
reflect
by yelban
回顧當前對話,分析完成的任務、遇到的錯誤、使用者回饋, 萃取學習洞察並建議寫入 memory 或建立/改進 skill。 觸發詞:/reflect、反思、回顧對話、conversation review